Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
categorised to be
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "categorised to be" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey the idea of being classified or assigned to a particular category, but the construction is awkward. Example: "The items were categorised to be part of the new inventory system."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
The data collated from that game suggested he covered more ground than any team-mate besides Cesc Fàbregas while he was on the pitch, with many of his runs logged as high intensity, and is therefore not categorised to be in the "fatigue zone" where the risk of sustaining injury is higher.
News & Media
Forty-three percent of patients with 18q deletion were categorised to be at risk of autism and the likelihood was significantly increased when TCF4, NETO1 and FBXO15 were included in the region of hemizygosity [34].
Sixty-three questions were patient-specific while 37 were categorised to be more general.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
To date, PTX preparations that are categorised to DDSs have been developed.
Science
In this categorisation, one standard may be categorised to several different technologies.
Questions were categorised to elicit patients' demographic characteristics, knowledge, perception and practice of various lifestyle-modification measures.
Three patients were categorised to have no morphologic response.
Science
In Finland, the index vignette and vignette 1 are categorised to different DRGs.
Science
Age and schistosome infection intensity was categorised to satisfy the assumptions of parametric tests (see [37]).
Science
Per-capita monthly expenditure was categorised to quintiles: q1 (lowest) to q5 (highest).
Science
Where appropriate, themes were categorised to facilitate higher-level interpretation of the data.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using "categorised to be" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more direct alternatives like "classified as" or "designated as".
Common error
While understandable, the phrase "categorised to be" sounds unnatural. Using more concise phrasing improves clarity and professionalism.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "categorised to be" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something is being assigned to a category. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this construction is grammatically awkward and less preferred than more direct alternatives. See the examples for better alternatives.
Frequent in
Science
67%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "categorised to be" appears in various contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect and awkward. Ludwig AI suggests opting for more standard alternatives such as "classified as" or "designated as" to improve clarity and professionalism. The phrase's usage is rare, and it's primarily found in science and news-related sources. For authoritative writing, avoid using "categorised to be" and choose more direct and grammatically sound alternatives.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
classified as
Replaces the verb "categorised" with "classified" and uses "as" instead of "to be" for a more direct categorization.
designated as
Uses "designated" to indicate a formal assignment to a category.
identified as
Emphasizes the act of recognizing and labeling something within a category.
deemed to be
Implies a judgment or opinion leading to categorization.
considered as
Highlights the process of thinking about something's category.
regarded as
Similar to "considered as" but suggests a more widespread or established viewpoint.
grouped as
Focuses on the act of placing items together into a category.
labeled as
Indicates the assignment of a specific label to a category.
defined as
Suggests a formal or explicit definition determines the category.
characterized as
Highlights the defining characteristics that place something in a category.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "categorised to be"?
You can use alternatives such as "classified as", "designated as", or "identified as" depending on the context.
Is "categorised to be" grammatically correct?
No, "categorised to be" is not considered standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "classified as" or "designated as".
How can I use "classified as" instead of "categorised to be"?
Instead of saying "The data was categorised to be sensitive", you can say "The data was classified as sensitive".
What's the difference between "categorised to be" and "considered to be"?
"Categorised to be" implies a formal or structured assignment, while "considered to be" suggests a more subjective evaluation or opinion.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested