Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

categorised to be

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "categorised to be" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey the idea of being classified or assigned to a particular category, but the construction is awkward. Example: "The items were categorised to be part of the new inventory system."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

The data collated from that game suggested he covered more ground than any team-mate besides Cesc Fàbregas while he was on the pitch, with many of his runs logged as high intensity, and is therefore not categorised to be in the "fatigue zone" where the risk of sustaining injury is higher.

Forty-three percent of patients with 18q deletion were categorised to be at risk of autism and the likelihood was significantly increased when TCF4, NETO1 and FBXO15 were included in the region of hemizygosity [34].

Sixty-three questions were patient-specific while 37 were categorised to be more general.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

To date, PTX preparations that are categorised to DDSs have been developed.

In this categorisation, one standard may be categorised to several different technologies.

Questions were categorised to elicit patients' demographic characteristics, knowledge, perception and practice of various lifestyle-modification measures.

Three patients were categorised to have no morphologic response.

In Finland, the index vignette and vignette 1 are categorised to different DRGs.

Age and schistosome infection intensity was categorised to satisfy the assumptions of parametric tests (see [37]).

Science

Plosone

Per-capita monthly expenditure was categorised to quintiles: q1 (lowest) to q5 (highest).

Science

BMJ Open

Where appropriate, themes were categorised to facilitate higher-level interpretation of the data.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "categorised to be" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more direct alternatives like "classified as" or "designated as".

Common error

While understandable, the phrase "categorised to be" sounds unnatural. Using more concise phrasing improves clarity and professionalism.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "categorised to be" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something is being assigned to a category. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this construction is grammatically awkward and less preferred than more direct alternatives. See the examples for better alternatives.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "categorised to be" appears in various contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect and awkward. Ludwig AI suggests opting for more standard alternatives such as "classified as" or "designated as" to improve clarity and professionalism. The phrase's usage is rare, and it's primarily found in science and news-related sources. For authoritative writing, avoid using "categorised to be" and choose more direct and grammatically sound alternatives.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "categorised to be"?

You can use alternatives such as "classified as", "designated as", or "identified as" depending on the context.

Is "categorised to be" grammatically correct?

No, "categorised to be" is not considered standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "classified as" or "designated as".

How can I use "classified as" instead of "categorised to be"?

Instead of saying "The data was categorised to be sensitive", you can say "The data was classified as sensitive".

What's the difference between "categorised to be" and "considered to be"?

"Categorised to be" implies a formal or structured assignment, while "considered to be" suggests a more subjective evaluation or opinion.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: