Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
categorise into
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"categorise into" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It is typically used when discussing the act of grouping things or ideas into specific categories. Example: After conducting research on different types of diets, the nutritionist was able to categorise them into three main groups: low-carb, Mediterranean, and plant-based.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
Individuals are only coded as 'not included elsewhere' if they respond 'yes' to the question about further qualifications and then give a response to the write-in question that Statistics New Zealand cannot categorise into a standard post-secondary level (or they leave it blank).
Science
The patterns of chromosome aberration in ovarian cancer are difficult to categorise into the groups described by Hicks et al. as most are a combination of sawtooth and firestorm.
Science
Both Catastrophising and Cognitive Coping score cut-offs could still be used to categorise into the low risk group.
In the assessment of radiographic hip OA, it is common to categorise into none, mild, moderate and severe.
A content analysis of "other" problems - that is, problems that operators could not categorise into existing PL categories - is also provided.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Stablecoins can also be categorised into public and private stablecoins.
Academia
The strains were categorised into three groups: low, medium, and high biofilm producers.
Science & Research
The strains were categorised into two groups: PIA-independent (non-PIA) and -dependent (PIA) biofilm producers.
Science & Research
They can be categorised into roughly three groups: bodies, food and relationships.
News & Media
This is a brilliant novel which cannot really be categorised into one genre.
News & Media
Broadly speaking, they can be categorised into red, green and brown algae.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "categorise into", ensure that the categories are well-defined and mutually exclusive to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid creating categories that overlap significantly, as this can lead to confusion and make the categorization process less effective. Ensure each item fits clearly into only one category.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "categorise into" functions as a phrasal verb, indicating the action of assigning items or concepts to specific categories. Examples from Ludwig show its usage in various contexts, such as categorising patients into risk groups or problems into existing categories.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
20%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "categorise into" is a phrasal verb used to describe the process of assigning items or concepts to specific groups or classes. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and acceptable for use in diverse contexts, particularly in science, news, and academic writing. While there are several alternatives such as "classify into" and "group into", it's important to ensure that categories are clearly defined to maintain clarity. Despite its relatively uncommon frequency, mastering this term can add precision to your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
classify into
Focuses on the act of arranging things into classes or groups based on shared qualities or characteristics.
group into
Highlights the action of forming groups, emphasizing the collective aspect of the items being categorized.
divide into
Stresses the separation of a whole into distinct parts or categories.
sort into
Implies arranging items systematically according to type or class.
arrange into
Suggests placing items in a specific order or structure within categories.
allocate to
Focuses on assigning items to specific categories or groups.
assign to
Emphasizes the act of designating items to particular categories.
lump together
Suggests grouping items, often implying a simplification or generalization.
pigeonhole
Implies a strict and sometimes limiting categorization of items or people.
index under
Focuses on organizing items for easy retrieval, often in a structured database or list.
FAQs
How can I use "categorise into" in a sentence?
You can use "categorise into" to describe how items are grouped. For example, "The books were categorised into fiction and nonfiction".
What is a good alternative to "categorise into"?
Alternatives include "classify into", "group into", or "sort into", depending on the context.
Which is correct: "categorise into" or "categorise as"?
"Categorise into" is used to indicate the groups something is placed within, while "categorise as" describes the nature or type of something. For example, "categorise into groups" versus "categorise as important".
What's the difference between "categorise into" and "classify into"?
The phrases "categorise into" and "classify into" are nearly synonymous, with "classify" sometimes implying a more formal or scientific approach to categorization.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested