categorically excluded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "categorically excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something is explicitly and unequivocally ruled out or not considered. Example: "The proposal was categorically excluded from the funding options due to its lack of alignment with the project's goals."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

He said Mr. Yanez's blood type categorically excluded him as a possible rapist.

The New York Times

Actually, it's the extent to which we are categorically excluded from whatever it is machines are doing that matters.

The Guardian - Books

"Offers to provide or requests to obtain child pornography are categorically excluded from the First Amendment," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the 7-to-2 majority.

The New York Times

The final screen indicated that the only citizens who remain categorically excluded today are those convicted of serious crimes, who in some states are disenfranchised for life.

The New York Times - Travel

How much more "clearly established" could the federal law be than the Supreme Court's statement that "the mentally retarded should be categorically excluded from execution"?

The New York Times

Justice Antonin Scalia explained in 2008 that "offers to provide or requests to obtain child pornography are categorically excluded from the First Amendment".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Dark green funds categorically exclude companies that deal in unethical products or services.

The Guardian - Money

"Anytime you categorically exclude anybody with blue hair and green eyes," Mr. Cleland said, "you're going to tick people off".

The New York Times

For four decades, he has been consistently diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic, which should categorically exclude him from the possibility of execution under established Supreme Court precedent.

The New York Times

Let us hope that this initiative paves the way for a city program that does not categorically exclude architecturally and historically significant buildings simply because they are owned by religious organizations.

The New York Times

Interestingly, the failure of the combination prazosin plus rauwolscine to abolish (although markedly blocked) the DHE responses in ritanserin-pretreated rats (Fig. 4c) cannot categorically exclude the possible role of additional (although negligible) mechanisms, including an enhanced synthesis of proconstrictor prostaglandins by DHE, as reported by Müller-Schweinitzer [26].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing for scientific contexts, use "categorically excluded" when you have solid data or reasons that lead to the elimination of a possibility.

Common error

Avoid using "categorically excluded" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "not included" or "ruled out" are often more appropriate and natural in less formal settings.

Linguistic Context

Adverbial Modifier and Predicate Complement: The phrase "categorically excluded" functions as an adverbial modifier, emphasizing the manner in which something is excluded. It often serves as a predicate complement, completing the meaning of the verb, as seen in Ludwig's examples where certain possibilities are definitively ruled out.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "categorically excluded" is grammatically sound and serves to express a definitive and absolute exclusion. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, it maintains a formal register. While versatile, it's best suited for situations demanding precision. Remember that while "categorically excluded" is correct to use, simpler alternatives may be more natural in informal settings. Using this phrase helps convey a sense of certainty and decisiveness in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

definitely excluded

Emphasizes the certainty of exclusion.

explicitly ruled out

Highlights that the exclusion is clearly stated.

absolutely prohibited

Focuses on the ban or prohibition.

completely barred

Suggests a total restriction.

unequivocally rejected

Indicates a clear and unambiguous rejection.

formally disallowed

Implies the exclusion is official or legal.

totally precluded

Means made impossible or prevented.

inadmissible under any circumstances

Stresses there are no exceptions to the exclusion.

off-limits entirely

Indicates a boundary that cannot be crossed.

strictly forbidden

Emphasizes a strong command against something.

FAQs

What does "categorically excluded" mean?

The phrase "categorically excluded" means something is definitively and absolutely not included or considered. It implies a firm and unambiguous rejection or exclusion.

When is it appropriate to use "categorically excluded"?

It's appropriate to use "categorically excluded" when you want to emphasize a firm and absolute exclusion, especially in formal, legal, or scientific contexts. For less formal situations, simpler alternatives may be better.

What are some alternatives to "categorically excluded"?

You can use alternatives like "definitely excluded", "explicitly ruled out", or "absolutely prohibited" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "categorically excluded"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The adverb "categorically" modifies the verb "excluded", indicating the manner of exclusion is absolute and without exception.