cases into groups

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cases into groups" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the organization or categorization of different cases or instances in a particular context, such as research or analysis. Example: "In our study, we will categorize the cases into groups based on their similarities."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

In the present study, using such attributes and their results computed we classified test cases into groups of healthy subjects and patients with multilayer perceptron neural networks.

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

A major advance was the application of gene expression profiling (GEP) to the study of DLBCL which further clarified this heterogeneity and provided a rationale for subdividing cases into groups.

Pathology

We separated these cases into groups where there was no evidence of segmental arterial constriction non-vasoconstrictive aetiology (398 cases - Table 6) and vasoconstriction syndromes, (234 cases - Table 7).

The Journal of Headache and Pain

CART analysis has been used for the estimation of the cut-off points of AREG and EREG mRNA expression, in order to classify cases into groups of a dependent (TTP and mOS) variable.

Plosone

The median value was used to define cases into groups of high and low TPcc reactivity.

British Journal of Cancer

A recent review of case reports divided cases into groups based on peak temperature.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Moreover, we divided the total cases into two groups (death group and survival group) and tried to find some factors characteristically involved in the prognosis of sTTP.

Clinical Rheumatology

We randomly divided ICOD cases into two groups: one group (ndg = 49) was used for algorithm development (i.e., development group); the other group (ntg = 50) was used for algorithm validity testing (i.e., test group).

Emerging Infectious Diseases

As stated in Materials and Methods section, we stratified the positive cases into two groups, ISG (intermediate score group) and HSG (high score group).

BMC Cancer

After a retrospective chart review, we divided the 12 cases into two groups of six lesions each: group A was treated with rhBMP-2 plus ACS, and group B was treated with ACS alone.

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

We divided all cases into two groups: Foxp3+-high (n=40) and Foxp3+-low (n=40) groups, by the median size of the population of Foxp3+ cells.

British Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientific papers, ensure that your criteria for dividing "cases into groups" are clearly defined and reproducible. This enhances the validity and reliability of your findings.

Common error

Avoid using vague or overlapping criteria when dividing "cases into groups". Clearly differentiate each group to prevent misclassification and ensure meaningful comparisons.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cases into groups" functions as a descriptive term indicating the act of classifying or categorizing individual instances into distinct collections. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s a grammatically correct and usable phrase, frequently found in scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cases into groups" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression, particularly in scientific and research contexts, to describe the act of categorizing individual instances into distinct collections. Ludwig AI highlights its suitability for formal communication. The primary function is descriptive, facilitating organization and analysis for comparison and pattern identification. While the phrase is prevalent in scientific literature, it's essential to define group criteria clearly to avoid ambiguity and ensure accurate classification. Alternatives like "categorize instances into clusters" and "classify subjects by type" offer subtle variations in emphasis. In summary, "cases into groups" is a reliable and widely understood term in scientific discourse, provided its usage is precise and well-defined.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

divide cases by category

Emphasizes the action of dividing and uses the word 'category' instead of 'groups'.

group instances by attribute

Highlights the grouping of instances according to specific attributes or features.

organize the data into distinct groups

Highlights the process of organizing data into clearly distinguishable groups.

categorize instances into clusters

Uses more technical terms like 'instances' and 'clusters' to emphasize a data-driven, analytical classification.

separate observations into classes

Uses 'observations' and 'classes' to suggest a more formal or scientific context of separation.

classify subjects by type

Focuses on classifying subjects based on their type or characteristics, implying a more qualitative approach.

sort examples into sets

Implies a more organized and structured arrangement, using 'sets' instead of 'groups'.

partition items by characteristic

Focuses on partitioning items based on a specific characteristic, suggesting a systematic separation.

arrange situations into categories

Focuses on arrangement and uses 'situations' and 'categories' to broaden the context of classification.

stratify records into subgroups

Implies a hierarchical division, using 'stratify' and 'subgroups' to indicate a layered structure.

FAQs

How can I use "cases into groups" in a sentence?

You might say, "The researcher classified the "cases into groups" based on their symptom severity" or "We divided the "cases into groups" for further analysis".

What are some alternatives to "cases into groups"?

Consider using phrases like "categorize instances into clusters", "classify subjects by type", or "divide cases by category" to convey similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

Which is more appropriate: "cases into groups" or "grouping cases"?

Both phrases are acceptable, but ""cases into groups"" emphasizes the action of categorization, while "grouping cases" focuses on the process of forming groups. The best choice depends on the specific context and your intended emphasis.

What considerations are important when dividing "cases into groups" in research?

It's crucial to define clear and objective criteria for grouping, ensure that the groups are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, and justify the rationale behind your grouping strategy. This enhances the rigor and interpretability of your research findings.