carries no culpability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "carries no culpability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that someone or something is not responsible for a fault or wrongdoing. Example: "In this case, the defendant carries no culpability for the incident, as they were not present at the time."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It carries no traces.

The New Yorker

He carries no lunch.

The Washington Post

It carries no debt.

The New York Times

It carries no weight.

The Guardian

LibraryThing carries no advertising.

The New York Times

Polman carries no such baggage.

The New Yorker

Their calling carries no immunity.

Cornell University

The site carries no advertising.

Johns Hopkins University

The outfit carries no debt.

Forbes

Google News carries no advertising.

HuffPost

It carries no intrinsic authority.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "carries no culpability" in formal or legal contexts when you need to clearly state that someone or something is not responsible for a fault or wrongdoing.

Common error

Avoid using "carries no culpability" when the situation only involves a minor mistake or unintentional error. The phrase implies a more significant level of responsibility or legal implication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "carries no culpability" functions as a declaration of non-responsibility, often used in legal or formal settings. Ludwig AI indicates that it expresses the absence of fault or blame.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "carries no culpability" is a formal expression used to deny responsibility or blame for a particular event or action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and serves to explicitly absolve someone from fault. Given the lack of examples, its typical usage is difficult to pinpoint; however, it's expected to appear more frequently in legal, business, and formal communication. Related phrases include "bears no responsibility" and "is not at fault", offering similar but slightly varied ways to express the absence of culpability. While grammatically sound, its best to reserve this phrase for situations involving significant responsibility or legal implication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not at fault

Expresses the absence of responsibility in a more direct and common way.

is not responsible

A straightforward way of stating the lack of responsibility.

bears no responsibility

Replaces "carries" with "bears", emphasizing the act of holding or accepting responsibility.

assumes no responsibility

Highlights the active declination of taking responsibility.

holds no liability

Uses "liability" instead of "culpability", focusing on legal responsibility.

cannot be held accountable

Emphasizes the inability to assign responsibility or blame.

has no blame

Simplifies the phrase using "blame" instead of "culpability", making it less formal.

is exempt from blame

Indicates that someone or something is specifically excused from being blamed.

is without guilt

Focuses on the absence of guilt, suggesting moral innocence.

is clear of any wrongdoing

Affirms the absence of any implication in misconduct or illegal activities.

FAQs

How to use "carries no culpability" in a sentence?

You can use "carries no culpability" to indicate a lack of responsibility for wrongdoing, such as, "In this case, the defendant "carries no culpability" for the incident, as they were not present at the time."

What can I say instead of "carries no culpability"?

You can use alternatives like "bears no responsibility", "is not at fault", or "holds no liability" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "carries no culpability" or "has no culpability"?

Both "carries no culpability" and "has no culpability" are grammatically correct, but ""carries no culpability"" is typically used in more formal contexts to explicitly denote that the person is not the actor.

What's the difference between "carries no culpability" and "is not responsible"?

"Carries no culpability" suggests a more formal and potentially legalistic disavowal of blame, whereas "is not responsible" is a more general and less formal statement of non-responsibility.