carries no

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "carries no" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to indicate the absence of something, often in a formal or literary context. Example: "The report carries no evidence to support the claims." Alternative expressions include "contains no" and "holds no."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It carries no traces.

The New Yorker

Polman carries no such baggage.

The New Yorker

He carries no lunch.

The Washington Post

It carries no weight.

The Guardian

LibraryThing carries no advertising.

The New York Times

It carries no debt.

The New York Times

Their calling carries no immunity.

Cornell University

But being gay carries no higher burden.

The New York Times

But that carries no weight with you.

The Guardian - Books

The good assassin carries no regrets.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Uncle Vanya" carries no political messages.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Pair the phrase with abstract nouns like "authority", "risk", or "weight" to maximize its impact in formal writing.

Common error

Writers sometimes mistakenly add an extra negation, such as saying "doesn't carry no", which creates a double negative. Always follow "carries no" with a singular or mass noun to maintain the proper flow; for instance, use "carries no weight" rather than "carries no weights" unless specifically referring to multiple distinct physical objects.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "carries no" functions as a transitive verb phrase where the verb "carries" is negated by the determiner "no". In linguistic structures identified by Ludwig, this construction is used to state the absence of a quality, burden, or consequence associated with the subject. It is grammatically robust and often followed by abstract nouns such as "weight", "risk", "penalty", or "implications".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "carries no" is a robust and sophisticated English construction used to emphatically negate the presence of a specific attribute or consequence. According to Ludwig AI and the extensive examples from authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, it is a high-frequency phrase in professional, scientific, and news-based registers. It is particularly effective when discussing abstract concepts such as "weight", "authority", "risk", and "implications". Writers should favor "carries no" when they wish to convey a sense of precision and professional gravity, ensuring it is followed by the appropriate noun without creating double negatives. Its presence in prestigious academic databases confirms its status as a standard tool for clear, formal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not carry

A more standard, slightly less emphatic negative construction.

bears no

Often used for abstract relationships or evidence, such as in "bears no resemblance".

has no

The most common and simplest way to express a lack of something.

holds no

Often implies a lack of capacity or value, as in "holds no interest".

contains no

Suggests a lack of internal components or physical ingredients.

lacks any

Stronger emphasis on the total deficiency of the following noun.

possesses no

A formal way to say something does not have a specific characteristic.

conveys no

Focuses specifically on the failure to transmit a message or meaning.

entails no

Refers to the absence of logical or legal requirements/consequences.

involves no

Indicates that a process or action is free from a certain element.

FAQs

How do I use "carries no" in a sentence?

You use it as a verb phrase to show that something lacks a certain quality. For example: "This decision "carries no" weight in court."

What can I say instead of "carries no"?

You can use synonyms like "bears no", "holds no", or simply "has no" depending on your context.

Is "carries no" formal enough for a research paper?

Yes, it is highly appropriate. Examples from Ludwig show it is frequently used in journals like "Science" and by institutions like MIT to describe data that "carries no information".

What's the difference between "carries no" and "contains no"?

While "contains no" usually refers to physical ingredients or internal data, "carries no" often refers to abstract consequences, authority, or risks associated with an action.