capabilities for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'capabilities for' is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "The new printer has enhanced capabilities for faster print speeds."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Set up tracking capabilities for all of your campaigns.

WikiHow

| New cyberattack capabilities for President Obama.

The New York Times

The expensive national capabilities for collecting intelligence have divided management.

The New York Times

Did we have time and the capabilities for such preparations?

The Guardian

(2) and (3)(A), "space rapid capabilities" for "capabilities for operationally responsive space" in par.

Cornell University

The department does not have the capabilities for DNA testing.

The New York Times

NetDB includes search and reporting capabilities for extracting this information.

Stanford University

The database includes capabilities for remote data entry.

Columbia University

Different catalysts exhibit different capabilities for manipulating adsorbed oxygen.

Catalysis Today

Such transformations will create new capabilities for individuals and de­mands for and resistance to change.

The Guardian

Gamers choose one, then build up an economy, research and military capabilities for every battle.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing an organization's strengths, use "capabilities for" followed by a specific action or goal, like "capabilities for innovation" or "capabilities for rapid response".

Common error

Avoid using "capacity of" when describing an organization's abilities. "Capacity of" refers to the amount something can hold, while "capabilities for" refers to the ability to perform specific actions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "capabilities for" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, indicating the possession of specific abilities or capacities suited to a particular purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

26%

News & Media

43%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "capabilities for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote an entity's ability to perform specific actions. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and versatile, appearing across diverse fields such as science, news, and academia. While alternatives like "potential for" and "capacity for" exist, "capabilities for" specifically emphasizes demonstrated or existing abilities. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and avoid confusion with similar terms like "capacity of". Understanding the appropriate contexts and nuanced meanings allows for effective communication across various professional and academic settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

potential for

Focuses more on unrealized possibilities rather than existing abilities.

capacity for

Emphasizes the ability to hold, contain, or absorb something, either physically or metaphorically.

aptitude for

Highlights a natural inclination or talent.

skills for

Refers to learned abilities and expertise.

competencies for

Indicates a set of demonstrated skills and knowledge.

qualifications for

Highlights formal requirements or achievements that enable someone to do something.

talents for

Emphasizes innate abilities and gifts.

resources for

Refers to the availability of assets and means to achieve something.

provisions for

Implies arrangements or preparations made in advance.

arrangements for

Focuses on the act of planning or organizing something.

FAQs

How do I use "capabilities for" in a sentence?

Use "capabilities for" to describe an entity's ability to perform a specific task or action. For example, "The company has enhanced "capabilities for" data analysis".

What are some alternatives to "capabilities for"?

Depending on the context, you could use "potential for", "capacity for", or "skills for" as alternatives to "capabilities for".

Is it correct to say "capability for" instead of "capabilities for"?

"Capability for" refers to a singular ability, while "capabilities for" refers to multiple abilities. The choice depends on whether you're discussing one specific ability or a range of abilities.

What's the difference between "capabilities for" and "potential for"?

"Capabilities for" usually implies existing or demonstrated abilities, while "potential for" suggests future or unrealized possibilities.