candid submissions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "candid submissions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to honest, open, and straightforward contributions or entries, often in contexts like feedback, applications, or discussions. Example: "We encourage all participants to provide candid submissions to ensure a diverse range of perspectives."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Through this program, candid submissions from the public were used to promote multicultural learning and inclusivity, as well as to build campus relationships with curricular and co-curricular units engaged in diversity work on campus.

The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

In fact, editors should consider it a shortcoming of the submission if a candid discussion is lacking.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

They were candid photos.

The Guardian

He was never candid.

The New York Times - Arts

Have a candid conversation.

The New York Times

Welcome back, Candid Camera.

The New York Times

"We are ready to lead once more" is startlingly candid in its admission that, under Bush, the United States did not lead the world but attempted to bomb and bully it into submission.

The Guardian

"He is always candid".

The New York Times

You can be candid.

The New York Times

As usual, he was candid.

The New Yorker

I hate candid camera photographs!

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When requesting "candid submissions", clearly state the purpose and how the information will be used to encourage honest and thoughtful responses.

Common error

Avoid using "candid submissions" when seeking purely positive or complimentary feedback, as the term implies openness to critical or less favorable opinions as well.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "candid submissions" functions as a noun phrase, where the adjective "candid" modifies the noun "submissions". It describes the nature or quality of the submissions being sought or provided, indicating they are honest and straightforward. According to Ludwig AI, this usage is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "candid submissions" refers to honest and straightforward contributions, often sought in settings where genuine feedback is valued. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While not very frequent, its usage spans across academia, news, and scientific domains. Alternative phrases like "honest entries" or "frank contributions" may be used for subtle variations in meaning. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context aligns with a desire for open and potentially critical perspectives. Be aware of using it only when you seek for truthful information to avoid possible misunderstandings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

honest entries

Replaces "candid" with "honest", emphasizing truthfulness.

frank contributions

Uses "frank" to highlight directness and openness.

open submissions

Emphasizes the accessibility and transparency of the entries.

straightforward submissions

Highlights the clear and uncomplicated nature of the entries.

forthright contributions

Stresses the direct and unambiguous nature of the entries.

unreserved submissions

Indicates that the entries are without hesitation or limitation.

sincere entries

Focuses on the genuineness and authenticity of the submissions.

truthful contributions

Highlights the accuracy and honesty of the entries.

genuine submissions

Emphasizes the authenticity and sincerity of the entries.

transparent entries

Focuses on the clarity and openness of the submissions.

FAQs

How can I use "candid submissions" in a sentence?

You might say, "We encourage all participants to provide "candid submissions" to ensure a diverse range of perspectives".

What's a good alternative to "candid submissions"?

Consider using "honest entries" or "frank contributions", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

When is it appropriate to ask for "candid submissions"?

It is appropriate when you need honest, open, and possibly critical feedback or input, as opposed to simply seeking positive affirmations.

What does "candid" really mean in the context of "candid submissions"?

In this context, "candid" means straightforward, truthful, and sincere, implying a willingness to share both positive and negative perspectives without holding back.