can be disenfranchised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "can be disenfranchised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the loss of rights or privileges, particularly in relation to voting or participation in a system. Example: "Certain groups in society can be disenfranchised due to restrictive laws and regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Unfortunately, though, more young civic coach potatoes can be disenfranchised through an online invitation and those who respond to SMS nagging, since only 20% are willing to share their cell phone number (0.2*.04 = 0.008 vs..0.008

TechCrunch

Even when laws don't include explicit prohibitions against voting, people can be disenfranchised by confusion.

Huffington Post

If this crime was listed according to Article II, Section I, Item 7, the offender can be disenfranchised.

Wikipedia

Here's her full reaction today following a campaign event in Terre Haute, Ind. "I do not see how two of our largest and most significant states can be disenfranchised and left out of the process of picking our nominee without raising serious questions about the legitimacy of that nominee.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

No one will be disenfranchised on my watch".

The New York Times

*Disabled athletes, who said they would be disenfranchised.

The New York Times - Sports

Predictions that up to five million people might be disenfranchised turned out to be unfounded.

The New York Times

Sunni leaders in particular are angry at the prospect that they may be disenfranchised once again.

The New York Times

"No one should be disenfranchised in this time and age, even from a different location overseas.

The New York Times

Some also fear they will be disenfranchised.

BBC

Yet women continue to be disenfranchised.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing voting rights, use "can be disenfranchised" to specifically address the potential loss of voting privileges due to laws, regulations, or systemic issues.

Common error

While "can be disenfranchised" is appropriate for discussing rights, avoid using it loosely when referring to general feelings of dissatisfaction or disagreement. Instead, opt for terms like "ignored" or "overlooked" in such cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "can be disenfranchised" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a group or individual is the recipient of an action that deprives them of a right or privilege. Ludwig AI shows it in contexts related to voting rights, social justice, and political representation.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

25%

Science

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "can be disenfranchised" is a grammatically sound passive verb phrase used to describe the potential loss of rights or privileges, particularly in voting or political representation. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that it's most frequently found in news and media contexts. While grammatically correct, it should be used precisely, and not too loosely. Related phrases include "may be deprived of rights" and "might be excluded from voting" for similar meanings. The phrase is neutral and authoritative, making it suitable for various discussions on social justice and political issues.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

may be deprived of rights

Replaces "can be disenfranchised" with a more general term for losing rights. It's more formal.

might be excluded from voting

Specifically focuses on the exclusion from the voting process, adding clarity.

could be denied suffrage

Emphasizes the denial of the right to vote. It is a more formal and technical term.

may be marginalized

Shifts the focus to being pushed to the edges of society, implying a loss of influence.

could be disempowered

Highlights the loss of power or agency. It is more broad term.

might lose their voice

Focuses on the loss of ability to express opinions or influence decisions.

may be shut out of the process

Highlights the exclusion from a specific process or system.

might be denied participation

Focuses on the denial of the ability to participate in activities or decisions.

could be rendered powerless

Emphasizes the state of being without power or influence.

may become voiceless

Focuses on the state of having no voice or influence.

FAQs

How to use "can be disenfranchised" in a sentence?

Use "can be disenfranchised" to describe situations where people are deprived of their rights, especially the right to vote. For example, "Certain communities "can be disenfranchised" due to restrictive voter ID laws".

What's the difference between "can be disenfranchised" and "can be marginalized"?

"Can be disenfranchised" specifically refers to the loss of rights or privileges, particularly voting rights. "Can be marginalized" implies being pushed to the edges of society, with reduced influence or power, though not necessarily a loss of legal rights.

What can I say instead of "can be disenfranchised"?

You can use alternatives like "may be deprived of rights", "might be excluded from voting", or "could be denied suffrage" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "can be disenfranchised" or "are disenfranchised"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have different meanings. "Can be disenfranchised" implies a potential or possibility, while "are disenfranchised" indicates a current state of being deprived of rights.