by a joint decoder

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "by a joint decoder" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to technology, data processing, or communication systems where multiple sources or inputs are being decoded together. Example: "The data was successfully interpreted by a joint decoder, allowing for seamless integration of information from various channels."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The two channel codes are decoded by a joint decoder which observes the channel output Y.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The Slepian-Wolf theorem on lossless distributed source coding states that the optimal rate of joint encoding and decoding of two statistically dependent discrete signals can be achieved by using two independent encoders and a joint decoder [3].

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

At reception, we propose a joint decoder and estimator that exchanges soft information between the LDGM decoders and a data fusion stage.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

While there is no known tractable way to optimize a DJSC code for a given set of correlated sources and a MAC, a sub-optimal but effective and tractable framework is to encode each source using an independent channel code in such a manner that the resulting dependence between the MAC input codewords can be exploited by a joint decoder[9, 10].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

To estimate the complexity of decoding the overall code ({mathcal {C}}_{1} times cdots times {mathcal {C}}_{K}) using a joint sphere decoder, we follow [35] by using the notion of complexity exponent as a complexity measure.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Finally, although it is hard to estimate the scores of mixed tuples with this decoder, just like in [37], we expect that the joint decoder score for a tuple is roughly equal to the sum of the c individual simple decoder scores.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

According to the Slepian-Wolf theorem, by utilizing the correlation knowledge of the sources at the receiver, the joint decoder can achieve the same compression rate as in the case that the sources are encoded by optimum joint encoders.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

The possibility of such an achievement was foreseen in [20], where it was shown that the simple decoder capacity becomes equal to the joint decoder capacity as c0 goes to infinity.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

The whole system is shown in Figure 2. The FG/SPA is used as a joint synchronizer-decoder (see Figure 3) for all mentioned models.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Moreover, a joint precoder-decoder design can be thought of as an effective way to reduce the inter-data-stream interference that lowers the complexity of the PNC operation further by placing signal processing capabilities at both transmitters and the receiver.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

(A ) Decoding of touch by a linear decoder of pooled activity.

eLife

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing systems that process multiple inputs, use "by a joint decoder" to clearly indicate that the decoding process leverages information from all sources simultaneously for improved accuracy and efficiency.

Common error

Avoid using "by a joint decoder" when the decoding process is actually sequential or independent for each input. Joint decoding implies a simultaneous consideration of multiple inputs, not just processing them one after another.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "by a joint decoder" functions as an adverbial phrase, specifying the means or method by which something is decoded. Ludwig AI confirms this usage is grammatically sound and demonstrates its role in describing decoding processes.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "by a joint decoder" serves as a technical descriptor specifying a decoding process that leverages multiple inputs simultaneously. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical function is sound. It appears primarily in formal and scientific contexts, highlighting its role in describing technical implementations within research papers and documentation. While the phrase is not very common, its meaning is clear and alternatives such as "through a combined decoder" or "via a shared decoder" can be used to express similar concepts. Use it when you want to emphasize that the decoding process involves multiple inputs being considered together for more accurate results.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

through a combined decoder

Replaces "joint" with "combined", emphasizing the unified nature of the decoding process.

via a shared decoder

Substitutes "joint" with "shared", highlighting the collaborative aspect of the decoder.

utilizing a collective decoder

Replaces "by" with "utilizing" and "joint" with "collective", formalizing the expression.

with an integrated decoder

Emphasizes the integration of the decoder, rather than the joint nature of the decoding.

using a unified decoder

Focuses on the unified aspect of the decoder.

employing a common decoder

Highlights the shared resource aspect of the decoder.

by means of a syncretic decoder

Introduces a more technical term, "syncretic", to describe the decoder.

through an aggregated decoder

Replaces "joint" with "aggregated", which describes gathering into a cluster.

by way of a fused decoder

Emphasizes the combination of elements into a single decoder.

via a consolidated decoder

Highlights the consolidation of resources into a single decoder.

FAQs

How to use "by a joint decoder" in a sentence?

You can use "by a joint decoder" to describe a process where multiple signals are decoded together to improve accuracy, such as, "The data streams were processed "by a joint decoder" to leverage inter-signal correlations".

What can I say instead of "by a joint decoder"?

Alternatives include "through a combined decoder", "via a shared decoder", or "utilizing a collective decoder", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "by a joint decoder" or "by separate decoders"?

The choice depends on the decoding process. "By a joint decoder" indicates a simultaneous decoding of multiple signals, whereas "by separate decoders" implies independent decoding of each signal.

What's the difference between "by a joint decoder" and "using an integrated decoder"?

"By a joint decoder" emphasizes that the decoding is performed considering multiple inputs together. "Using an integrated decoder", or "with an integrated decoder", highlights that the decoder itself is a unified component, though it might not necessarily process multiple inputs simultaneously.