budgeted at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "budgeted at" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the amount of money allocated for a specific purpose or project in a budget. Example: "The project was budgeted at $500,000 for the upcoming fiscal year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Nabucco was originally budgeted at €7.9 billion, or $11.1 billion.

The New York Times

The generator project was initially budgeted at $40 million.

The New York Times

Stadium operations were budgeted at $1.6 million this year.

The New York Times - Sports

This summer's season has been budgeted at $35,000.

The New York Times

A chief focus is on the Elgin-O'Hare West Bypass project, budgeted at $3.57 billion.

The New York Times

Officials said the union's advertising campaign was budgeted at $73,000 for May.

The New York Times

Similar print ads, budgeted at another $5 million, will appear in travel trade and other publications.

The New York Times

Belo Monte is budgeted at $6.6 billion and scheduled to begin producing power in 2008.

The New York Times

The film, budgeted at $120m before marketing, is reportedly set to lose Fox more than $60m.

The Guardian - Film

The New Line Cinema film was budgeted at just $9 million.

The New York Times

The course, to have been designed by Jack Nicklaus, had been budgeted at $22 million.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about financial plans, use "budgeted at" to clearly state the amount of money that has been allocated for a specific project, activity, or item.

Common error

Avoid using "estimated at" when you want to convey that a sum of money has already been set aside. "Estimated at" suggests a prediction, while "budgeted at" implies a firm financial plan.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "budgeted at" functions as a compound verb phrase indicating the financial allocation for a specific item or project. It specifies the monetary value assigned within a budget. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating this usage, confirming its role in financial contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

21%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Reference

2%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "budgeted at" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate the amount of money allocated for a specific purpose or project. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, business, and formal documents, to provide clarity on financial planning. When using this phrase, ensure you are referring to a confirmed allocation of funds rather than a simple estimate. Related phrases include "allocated for", "earmarked for", and "funded with", each with slightly different connotations. By following these guidelines, you can confidently and effectively use "budgeted at" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

allocated for

Focuses more on the act of assigning funds for a specific purpose.

estimated to cost

Highlights the projected expenses rather than a firm budget.

earmarked for

Emphasizes that the funds are reserved or designated for a particular use.

funded with

Indicates the source of the money used for the budget.

valued at

Indicates the assessed worth or price, but lacks the financial commitment aspect.

costing around

Provides an approximate expenditure, less formal than budgeting.

expected expenditure of

Highlights the anticipated spending, suitable for forward-looking contexts.

projected spending of

Focuses on financial projections and forecasts.

with a budget of

Indicates a general upper limit on spending, rather than a detailed itemization.

priced at

Indicates the cost of goods/services as per the price list.

FAQs

How to use "budgeted at" in a sentence?

Use "budgeted at" to indicate the specific amount of money allocated for a particular purpose. For example, "The marketing campaign was "budgeted at" $50,000."

What can I say instead of "budgeted at"?

You can use alternatives like "allocated for", "earmarked for", or "funded with" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "budgeted at" or "estimated at"?

"Budgeted at" indicates a confirmed allocation of funds, while "estimated at" suggests a projected cost. The correct choice depends on whether the amount is a confirmed allocation or just a prediction.

What's the difference between "budgeted at" and "priced at"?

"Budgeted at" refers to the amount allocated in a budget, while "priced at" indicates the set cost or value of something. A project is "budgeted at" $1 million, while a product is "priced at" $20.