brought devastation to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "brought devastation to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in a sentence to describe an event that caused great destruction or destruction on a large scale. For example: "The hurricane brought devastation to coastal towns, leaving many without homes and resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

The judge said Gurpinar had brought devastation to Leroy's family.

Independent

"The Arabs should consider him a saint, but he brought devastation to the Kurds," Mr. Youssef said.

The New York Times

Flooding and severe weather at the beginning of December brought devastation to many homes and businesses, leaving 60,000 homes without power.

The Guardian

But he did not show moral courage when he took part in an immoral war that brought devastation to both Vietnam and the rest of Southeast Asia.

The New York Times

The arrival of winter storm Hercules from the US brought devastation to the Cornwall and Devon coasts, but out to sea professionals like Lyndon Wake and Andrew Cotton chased the prospect of 50ft waves.

Independent

Controversially, he will say: "For the past 14 years, Britain has been at the centre of a succession of disastrous wars that have brought devastation to large parts of the wider Middle East.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

Giant Tunnocks marshmallow man brings devastation to inner city areas.

Independent

They are also responding to widespread criticism that they are only bringing devastation to Sunni towns".

The Guardian

Violence has only undermined the Palestinians internationally, he has said, while bringing devastation to Palestinian areas from the far superior Israeli forces.

The New York Times

But its lethality has been used in the past to bring devastation to civilian neighborhoods, most famously by the Russians during the siege of the Chechen capital of Grozny over a decade ago, where thousands of civilians were killed and hundreds of buildings reduced to rubble.

The New York Times

The lapses were so egregious that it prompted our recent vote to authorize an independent commission to conduct a more far-reaching inquiry into how we could have done better and how we must do better in the future, because there is no longer any question as to the scope of the threat and the ability and the intent of terrorist groups to bring devastation to our soil.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "brought devastation to", ensure that the subject clearly identifies the cause or agent responsible for the destruction. This enhances clarity and impact in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using overly general subjects with "brought devastation to". Instead of saying "Things brought devastation to the area", specify what actually caused the devastation, such as "The flood brought devastation to the area".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "brought devastation to" functions as a verb phrase, where "brought" is the verb indicating the action of causing devastation, and "devastation" is the noun representing the effect. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness of the phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "brought devastation to" is a grammatically sound and useful expression for conveying significant destruction or damage caused by a specific agent or event. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and frequently used in various contexts. As highlighted by the examples provided, "brought devastation to" appears most commonly in news and media, wiki, and formal business contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure that the cause of the devastation is clearly identified to maximize the impact and clarity of your message. Alternative phrases, such as "caused widespread destruction" or "resulted in significant damage", can be used to add variety to your writing while maintaining a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

caused widespread destruction

Focuses on the extent of the destruction, removing the explicit agent.

resulted in significant damage

Emphasizes the damage caused, using a more neutral tone.

led to utter ruin

Highlights the completeness of the destruction.

created immense suffering

Shifts the focus to the suffering experienced as a result.

inflicted catastrophic damage upon

More formal and emphasizes the act of inflicting damage.

precipitated widespread destruction

Focuses on the event that triggered the destruction.

wrought havoc on

Uses a more figurative and emphatic term for destruction.

triggered a cataclysm in

Implies a sudden and violent event leading to destruction.

unleashed chaos upon

Emphasizes the disordered and destructive nature of the event.

sowed the seeds of destruction in

Focuses on the long-term consequences of the destructive event.

FAQs

How can I use "brought devastation to" in a sentence?

Use "brought devastation to" to describe an event or action that caused significant destruction or damage. For example, "The earthquake "brought devastation to" the city center".

What are some alternatives to "brought devastation to"?

You can use alternatives such as "caused widespread destruction", "resulted in significant damage", or "led to utter ruin" depending on the specific context and desired emphasis.

Is it correct to say "caused devastation to" instead of "brought devastation to"?

While "caused devastation to" is grammatically correct, "brought devastation to" often emphasizes the agent or event that initiated the destruction, providing a slightly different nuance.

What is the difference between "brought devastation to" and "caused damage to"?

"Brought devastation to" implies a more widespread and severe level of destruction compared to "caused damage to", which can refer to a lesser degree of harm.