broader implications for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "broader implications for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to more far-reaching consequences that may be caused by a particular action, event, or situation. For example: "The recent economic downturn has had broader implications for businesses across the country."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

-- which had broader implications for the economy.

University of California, Berkeley

It could have broader implications for internet copyright rules.

The Guardian - Tech

The Christian flight has broader implications for the Middle East.

The New Yorker

Another provision would have even broader implications for lawyers.

The New York Times

The broader implications for antigen-receptor biology are considered.

Nature

The case could have broader implications for international investing.

The New York Times

Our findings also have broader implications for practitioners and regulators.

Harvard University

The commission's decision could also have broader implications for political fundraising across political parties.

The Guardian

Giulio's case also has much broader implications for higher education in the UK and beyond.

The Guardian - Opinion

And that's where the case seems to have broader implications for forensics.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

He calls chemical attacks in Syria "an indirect attack on America's security with broader implications... for the world".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing complex issues, use "broader implications for" to signal that the topic's relevance extends beyond the immediate subject matter. This invites the reader to consider the wider context.

Common error

Avoid using "broader implications for" if the consequences are minimal or highly localized. Ensure the implications genuinely extend beyond the immediate scope to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "broader implications for" serves as a transitional element in sentences, introducing the idea that the topic under discussion has far-reaching effects beyond its immediate scope. It signals to the reader that the subject's importance extends to related areas, as demonstrated by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

38%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "broader implications for" is a versatile tool for highlighting the extensive reach of an event or decision. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. The phrase appears most frequently in news, scientific, and academic contexts, signaling a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, ensure that the implications genuinely extend beyond the immediate scope to maintain credibility. By understanding its function and context, writers can effectively communicate the significance of their topic.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

wider ramifications for

Changes 'implications' to 'ramifications', emphasizing the unfolding consequences; 'wider' suggests an extensive scope.

larger consequences for

Substitutes 'implications' with 'consequences', focusing on the effects of something; 'larger' indicates a greater magnitude.

far-reaching effects on

Replaces 'implications' with 'effects', highlighting the results of something; 'far-reaching' suggests extensive influence.

extensive consequences on

Using "consequences" instead of "implications" highlights the outcome of something. "Extensive" emphasizes the broad range of these consequences.

significant repercussions for

Employs 'repercussions' instead of 'implications', stressing the indirect consequences; 'significant' suggests considerable importance.

substantial impact on

Substitutes the whole phrase with "impact", denoting a marked effect or influence that something has. "Substantial" highlights this impact's major qualities.

extensive effects on

Replaces "implications" with "effects", underscoring the result or outcome of something and use 'extensive' which indicates an impact on a broad area.

wider consequences on

Using "consequences" instead of "implications" highlights the outcome of something. "Wider" emphasizes the reach of these consequences.

greater significance for

Changes 'implications' to 'significance', stressing importance; 'greater' indicates an increased level of importance.

deeper significance on

Changes 'implications' to 'significance', stressing importance; 'deeper' indicating a more profound level of importance.

FAQs

How can I use "broader implications for" in a sentence?

Use "broader implications for" to introduce the far-reaching consequences of an event, decision, or phenomenon. For example, "This policy change has "broader implications for" the entire industry".

What are some alternatives to "broader implications for"?

Alternatives include "wider ramifications for", "larger consequences for", or "far-reaching effects on", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "implications" and "consequences"?

"Implications" generally refer to potential or indirect effects, while "consequences" are the actual results or outcomes. Using "broader consequences" emphasizes direct results, while "broader implications" suggests a wider range of potential effects.

Is it more appropriate to use "broader implications for" or "significant implications for"?

Use "broader implications for" when you want to highlight the extensive scope of the effects. Opt for "significant implications for" when emphasizing the importance or weight of the consequences, regardless of their scope.