broad repercussions for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "broad repercussions for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the significant consequences or effects that an action or event may have on a particular group, situation, or context. Example: "The new policy could have broad repercussions for the entire industry, affecting jobs and market stability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

His fate could have broad repercussions for Hezbollah.

The New York Times

But any move against them could have broad repercussions for all Chinese internet stocks.European and American internet start-ups do not face a similar threat.

The Economist

Mr. Cooper's side, on the other hand, argued that to limit the claims would also have broad repercussions, for example making it easy for the government to silence whistleblowers by subjecting them to embarrassing disclosures.

The New York Times

The closure of the mine could well result in divided families and an even more fractured community ― like any number of other sweeping actions that had broad repercussions for Native Americans, but that weren't in their control.

Huffington Post

As a result India has been the centre of a legal battleground that has broad repercussions for access to NCD medicines.

Globalization and Health

This is likely to have broad repercussions for DNA repair because BRCA1 and ATM are intimately connected to the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures (Wang et al. 2000).

Clinical Epigenetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Mr. Dimon has maintained that the loss was an "isolated event" without broader repercussions for customers or taxpayers.

The New York Times

Policy makers stopped short of removing the ceiling on deposit rates, which analysts say would have much broader repercussions for the profitability of the country's giant banking industry and for the continued access of politically influential state-owned enterprises to low-cost financing.

The New York Times

While protectable intellectual property is an important and sometimes necessary incentive for product research and development, relevant commercializers and policy-makers should bear in mind the potential broad repercussions of patenting and licensing practices on cffDNA testing for aneuploidy [ 24].

Genome Medicine

The issue has wide repercussions for an ailing housing market.

The New York Times

The failure could have broad repercussions not only for the big laser, which is based at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, but also for federally financed science projects in general.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, follow "broad repercussions for" with a concise explanation of how these repercussions will manifest. This helps the reader understand the scope and significance of the phrase.

Common error

Avoid using "broad repercussions for" when the actual effects are minor or localized. Overstating the impact can undermine your credibility and make your writing seem exaggerated.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "broad repercussions for" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or clause, indicating the scope and direction of the consequences. As Ludwig AI suggests, it conveys significant and widespread effects on a particular subject.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "broad repercussions for" is a phrase used to denote significant and widespread consequences stemming from a particular event or action. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and commonly used in various contexts, particularly in news and media, and scientific writing. The phrase aims to highlight the expansive impact on a specific subject. While it is considered uncommon, it is effective in conveying the magnitude of the consequences, especially when followed by concrete examples. Alternatives include "wide-ranging consequences for" and "significant ramifications for", each offering subtle variations in meaning. Remember to use this phrase accurately, avoiding exaggeration to maintain credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

wide-ranging consequences for

Changes 'broad' to 'wide-ranging', emphasizing the extensive scope of the consequences.

significant ramifications for

Replaces 'repercussions' with 'ramifications', suggesting a more formal and far-reaching impact.

extensive implications for

Uses 'implications' instead of 'repercussions', highlighting the indirect effects and future consequences.

far-reaching effects on

Focuses on the 'effects' rather than 'repercussions', indicating a more direct and visible impact.

major consequences for

Emphasizes the 'major' scale of the consequences, making the impact sound critical.

substantial impact on

Highlights the 'substantial impact', focusing on the significant influence or effect.

considerable effects on

Uses 'considerable effects' to point out the noteworthy and important impacts.

serious consequences for

Focuses on the 'serious' nature of the consequences, implying a severe impact.

profound impact on

Replaces "broad repercussions" with "profound impact", indicating a deeply influential and transformative effect.

sweeping changes to

Emphasizes the 'sweeping' nature of the changes, indicating comprehensive and widespread alterations.

FAQs

How can I use "broad repercussions for" in a sentence?

You can use "broad repercussions for" to indicate that an event or action will have significant and widespread effects. For example, "The new policy could have "broad repercussions for" the entire industry".

What are some alternatives to "broad repercussions for"?

Alternatives include "wide-ranging consequences for", "significant ramifications for", or "far-reaching effects on", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "broad repercussions for" or "significant impact on"?

The choice depends on the context. "Broad repercussions for" suggests a wide range of effects, while "significant impact on" emphasizes a notable influence on a specific area. Using "significant impact on" focuses more on a direct effect, whereas "broad repercussions for" suggests the effects may spread to other areas.

What is the difference between "broad implications for" and "broad repercussions for"?

"Implications" refer to potential future consequences, while "repercussions" usually refer to more immediate or already occurring effects. So, "broad implications for" highlights future possible consequences, whereas "broad repercussions for" highlights consequences that are either current or have already happened.