Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
breached standards for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "breached standards for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone or something has violated or failed to meet established standards or regulations. Example: "The company was fined for having breached standards for safety protocols in the workplace."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
A panel found he breached standards for equality and diversity.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Relevant sections of the broadcasting code are thought to include whether Sky has caused harm and offence, or breached standards of fairness and privacy.
News & Media
In its ruling, the European court found that Spain had breached standards of international human rights, notably because the precedent was applied retroactively to the sentencing of Ms. del Río Prada.
News & Media
Cooper was found to have breached standards relating to authority, respect and courtesy, equality and diversity, discreditable conduct and challenging and reporting improper conduct.
News & Media
Energy efficiency standards for light bulbs.
News & Media
Currently standards for males and females differ.
News & Media
"There are industry standards for performance".
News & Media
And they've been standards for years.
News & Media
Higher living standards for working families.
News & Media
British Standards, for British People!
News & Media
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board establishes standards for CAFR preparation.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "breached standards for", ensure that the specific standards being violated are clearly identified. This adds clarity and strengthens the impact of your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "breached standards for" without specifying the exact standards that were violated. Vague statements can weaken your argument and reduce credibility. Always be specific about which rules or guidelines were not followed.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "breached standards for" functions as a verb phrase followed by a noun phrase and a preposition, indicating a failure to adhere to established rules or guidelines. Ludwig AI confirms this is a correct and usable English expression.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Wiki
17%
Science
17%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
8%
Formal & Business
8%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "breached standards for" is a grammatically sound phrase used to express the violation of specific established standards. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in English. While not the most common phrase, it is frequently found in news and media contexts, indicating a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly identify the specific standards that were violated to maintain clarity and impact. Alternatives like "violated regulations for" or "failed to comply with standards for" can be considered based on the specific nuance you want to convey.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Violated regulations for
Focuses specifically on breaking established rules, more formal.
Failed to comply with standards for
Highlights the lack of adherence to specific norms or requirements.
Did not meet the criteria for
Emphasizes a failure in fulfilling specific conditions or requirements.
Transgressed guidelines for
Suggests a crossing of boundaries, often in a more formal or serious context.
Fell short of expectations for
Focuses on a disappointment in performance or outcome relative to a benchmark.
Deviated from the norm for
Indicates a departure from usual or accepted practice.
Compromised requirements for
Implies a weakening or undermining of essential needs.
Infringed upon the principles of
Highlights that the principles were not followed.
Ignored benchmarks for
Focuses on lack of attention to recognized level of quality.
Overstepped parameters for
Expresses the concept of going beyond the limits.
FAQs
How can I use "breached standards for" in a sentence?
You can use "breached standards for" to indicate that someone or something has failed to meet certain established rules, regulations, or guidelines. For example, "The company was fined for having "breached standards for" safety protocols in the workplace".
What are some alternatives to "breached standards for"?
Some alternatives include "violated regulations for", "failed to comply with standards for", or "did not meet the criteria for", depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "breached standards of" instead of "breached standards for"?
While "breached standards of" might be grammatically acceptable in some contexts, ""breached standards for"" is generally preferred when specifying what the standards pertain to. It provides a clearer and more direct connection to the violated guidelines.
What's the difference between "breached standards for" and "violated standards"?
"Violated standards" is a more general term that indicates a failure to adhere to some kind of regulations, while ""breached standards for"" specifies which standards were not followed. The latter is more precise and provides additional context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested