bound by provisions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bound by provisions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, contractual, or formal contexts to indicate that someone is obligated to adhere to specific terms or conditions. Example: "The parties involved are bound by provisions outlined in the contract, ensuring compliance with all agreed-upon terms."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The United States is not a member of the International Criminal Court and is not bound by provisions that require members to carry out arrest warrants on fugitive defendants.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Legally, city planning staff said, the new entity would be bound by whatever provisions Occidental agrees to, but several council members seemed unsatisfied.

Los Angeles Times

The Greek authorities have denounced the conven tion, but the Council of Europe contends that they are still bound by its provisions.

The New York Times

such laboratory agrees in a separate writing to be bound by the provisions described in paragraph (1)(A) through (F).

Cornell University

"No state may decide it is no longer bound by the provisions of the convention, no matter what the circumstance," he added.

The Guardian

It is formal confirmation of the publishing companies' refusal to be bound by the provisions laid down in the press regulation royal charter and it amounts to a giant snub to the coalition and the Labour party leadership.

The Guardian

There has long been a debate about whether presidents are bound by the provisions of the War Powers Act of 1973 that require consultation with and approval from Congress to involve the United States in hostilities.

The New York Times

Only nations that ratify the treaty are bound by its provisions, though some of its less disputed ideas are already accepted as common law, like the 230-mile exclusive economic zones claimed by many of the world's coastal states.

The New York Times - Science

The contract also specifies that the children are able to leave the production at any time, but that in doing so they will lose their right to receive payment and will still be bound by confidentiality provisions.

The New York Times - Arts

The Supreme Court should have ruled that the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations was clearly the law of the land, and that they themselves and the state of Texas were bound by the provisions of that treaty, including the right of accused foreign nationals to consular access.

The New York Times

The requirement is deleted from section 742 since the trustee of an intrastate stockbroker will be bound by the provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 7 if the debtor is also a commodity broker by reason of section 103 of title 11.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "bound by provisions" in legal or contractual contexts, ensure that the specific provisions are clearly defined and referenced to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "bound by provisions" without specifying which provisions are applicable. Always provide specific context or references to the relevant terms and conditions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bound by provisions" functions as a postpositive adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate an obligation or restriction imposed by specific terms or conditions. Ludwig AI confirms this with its analysis of real-world usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

25%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "bound by provisions" is a grammatically correct and usable English expression, primarily employed in formal and legal settings to denote an obligation to adhere to specific terms or conditions. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase functions effectively to specify compliance and is often found in news, academic, and business contexts. While relatively infrequent, its usage is straightforward: always ensure the specific provisions are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "subject to terms" or "obligated by stipulations" may be used depending on the desired nuance. The usage analysis suggests that its application remains largely within professional and formal communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subject to terms

Focuses on the conditions affecting something rather than an obligation.

obligated by stipulations

Emphasizes the legal or moral duty to comply with specific conditions.

required to adhere to conditions

Stresses the necessity of following particular requirements.

governed by regulations

Highlights the influence of formal rules on actions or processes.

compliant with the conditions

Highlights the state of adhering to specific conditions or requirements.

constrained by requirements

Emphasizes limitations imposed by specific needs or criteria.

restricted by clauses

Focuses on the limiting aspect of specific contractual terms.

tied to specifications

Highlights the adherence to precise technical or design details.

controlled by mandates

Emphasizes the authoritative nature of the rules or orders.

limited by restrictions

Focuses on the imposed boundaries affecting freedom or scope.

FAQs

How to use "bound by provisions" in a sentence?

You can use "bound by provisions" to indicate that someone or something is obligated to adhere to specific terms or conditions, such as "The parties involved are "bound by provisions" outlined in the contract".

What can I say instead of "bound by provisions"?

Alternatives include "subject to terms", "obligated by stipulations", or "required to adhere to conditions" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "bound by provisions" or "bound to provisions"?

"Bound by provisions" is correct. "Bound to provisions" is grammatically incorrect and not commonly used.

What's the difference between "bound by provisions" and "constrained by requirements"?

"Bound by provisions" typically refers to legal or contractual obligations, while "constrained by requirements" can refer to more general limitations or necessities.