Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
In both experiments, there was significant difference between uncorrected and corrected SUVmean.
For both experiments, there was no substantial difference in optimum measurement time among stages and among H/S ratios, with maximum difference of 0.3 h and 0.4 h respectively.
In both experiments, there was an interaction (P<0.01) between EO addition and initial pH on acetate proportion; at the initial pH of 5.5, EO addition decreased acetate from 65.0 to 63.9 and from 62.6 to 61.8 mM/100 mM, respectively, for DC and FB rumen liquors, while there were no effects of EO at the initial pH of 7.0.
In both experiments, there was no difference in cell death between WT and bmf-deficient cells for sham-treated controls.
Note that in both experiments there was no influence of age on female mating success (χexp1 = 5.42; χexp2 = 0.786; df = 2, P > 0.05 for overall comparison).
In both experiments, there was more inoculum where volunteers had not been destroyed than where they were not present or were destroyed 'early' but only in Experiment 4 were these differences significant.
Similar(53)
In both experiments, there were no effects of population isolation.
In both experiments there were powerful effects of repeated 'relevant checking': while actual memory accuracy remained unaffected, the vividness and detail of the recollections were greatly reduced.
In both experiments there is a positive correlation between difference limen and the magnitude of the repetition effect (for Experiment 1, r = .65, p = .012, Spearman's rho = .64, p = .014; for Experiment 2, r = .64, p = .002, Spearman's rho = .71, p<.001).
In both experiments there were two independent variables, the sort of conjunction (A and B, not-A and B, A and not-B, not-A and not-B) and the sort of scenario (enabler or baseline).
Additionally, in both these experiments, there was spatial heterogeneity in the density of the amoebocytes, with areas adjacent to the fungal infections having the highest concentration of cells.
Related(20)
both trials there was
both surveys there was
both stores there was
both models there was
both times there was
both parties there was
both studies there was
both systems there was
both men there was
both walls there was
both crises there was
both operations there was
both women there was
both components there was
both patients there was
both mutants there was
both cases there was
both datasets there was
both groups there was
both experiments there were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com