Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(21)
In both studies there was no effect (P>0.05) of treatment on OM intakes.
However, in both studies, there was an improvement in the American Fertility Society (AFS) scores compared to the no-treatment controls and the European pilot study demonstrated a significant reduction in adnexal adhesions [48].
For women aged 18 to 21 in both studies there was no significant protection because they did not use the ring consistently.
In both studies there was evidence of extensive genetic diversity among isolates but in Kenya there was no direct evidence of clonal expansion of particular genotypes.
In both studies, there was no significant association between rs4646 and AI treatment outcome [ 9, 31].
In both studies, there was a clustering of valuations around whole numbers of years.
Similar(39)
The population studied was: 107 patients (with HAART) and 152 patients (no HAART) and in both studies there were a higher frequency in young white males.
In both studies there are two lesions (arrows) considered BIRADS III under follow-up.
In both studies there is a factor related to the management of the improvement implementation as a project.
Also, in both studies there are factors that relate to the dissemination of the obtained results and the advertisement of the improvement project to the people involved.
When comparing the ranks of phyla common to both studies there were four exact matches and four instances where phyla differed by only one rank.
More suggestions(21)
both studies there is
both studies however was
both trials there was
both stores there was
both times there was
both parties there was
both forwards there was
both men there was
both systems there was
both walls there was
both strains there was
both places there was
both crises there was
both operations there was
both women there was
both components there was
both patients there was
both studies there were
both mutants there was
both datasets there was
both experiments there was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com