both are identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "both are identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to two subjects or items that have been recognized or named in a particular context. Example: "In the study, both are identified as key factors influencing the outcome."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Both are identified based on literature reviews and expert opinions.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Although they both are identified as inhibitors of cell wall biosynthesis, only CITDs evolved membrane disruptive ability by peptide oligomerization to form pores.

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

This motivates an improved boundary condition application approach, which considers constitutive material parameters as well as kinematic variables at the boundary of the entire MVE as degrees of freedom in the IDIC procedure, assuring that both are identified with equal precision and importance.

International Journal of Solids and Structures

From a futures research perspective, both are identified as being central challenges to scenario quality.

European Journal of Futures Research

The directors of the Betrayal Ellen Kuras and Thavisouk Phrasavath have been identified as co-directors throughout the awards season but now the co-director has been dropped and both are identified as director.

Huffington Post

However, greater prescribing of broad-spectrum compared to narrow-spectrum antimicrobials and seasonal variation of quinolone antimicrobials reported in study practices may be of particular concern, as both are identified as significant risk factors for Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) and the development of antimicrobial resistance [ 21, 22].

BMC Family Practice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Both are identifying ligand-receptor interactions to highlight important ligand features to be selected for creating pharmacophore models automatically.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Both were identified as Chechens, but they deny that.

The New York Times

Both were identified as being important to fostering community.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

As expected both were identified as CCBs with different selectivity over ACE inhibition.

European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Most loops had habit planes of {10¯10} and some of (0 0 0 1), and both were identified to be of interstitial type.

Acta Materialia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "both are identified", ensure the context clearly establishes what "both" refers to, avoiding ambiguity for the reader. For instance, specify the subjects or items before stating they are identified.

Common error

Avoid using "both are identified" without a clear antecedent. Ensure the reader knows exactly which two items or subjects are being discussed to prevent confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "both are identified" functions as a passive construction, indicating that two distinct entities have undergone a process of recognition or determination. Ludwig examples showcase its use in scientific, news, and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

26%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "both are identified" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction to indicate that two specific items or entities have been recognized. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's commonly found in scientific, news, and formal contexts. While its usage is widespread, clarity is key. Ensure the reference for "both" is unambiguous. Alternatives like "both are recognized" or "both are known" can provide slight variations in meaning. The linguistic analysis shows a strong presence in scientific sources, highlighting its role in research and formal reporting.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

both are recognized

Changes the verb from "identified" to "recognized", implying a more general acknowledgment.

both are acknowledged

Substitutes "identified" with "acknowledged", suggesting acceptance or awareness.

both are known

Replaces "identified" with "known", indicating a state of being familiar or established.

both have been determined

Uses "determined" to imply a process of investigation leading to a conclusion about both.

both are pinpointed

Employs "pinpointed" to suggest a precise identification or location of both.

both are established

Uses "established" to convey that both items have been firmly recognized or proven.

both are classified

Replaces "identified" with "classified", implying a categorization or grouping of both.

both are designated

Substitutes "identified" with "designated", suggesting a formal assignment or naming of both.

both are discerned

Uses "discerned" to imply a careful or subtle recognition of both.

both are unearthed

Replaces "identified" with "unearthed", suggesting the discovery of both after a period of being hidden or unknown.

FAQs

How can I use "both are identified" in a sentence?

Use "both are identified" to indicate that two specific items or entities have been recognized or named. For example, "In the study, both genes "are identified" as potential targets".

What are some alternatives to saying "both are identified"?

You can use alternatives such as "both are recognized", "both are acknowledged", or "both are known depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "both are identified"?

Yes, "both are identified" is grammatically correct. It is a passive construction indicating that two subjects have been recognized or determined in some way.

What's the difference between "both are identified" and "both were identified"?

"Both are identified" indicates a present state of recognition, while "both were identified" indicates that the recognition occurred in the past. The choice depends on the timing you want to convey.