bombs completely

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bombs completely" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where something fails utterly or is unsuccessful in every aspect. Example: "The movie was highly anticipated, but it bombs completely at the box office, disappointing fans and critics alike."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

"These first bombs completely missed his neighborhood," Diane said, sitting in front of her office computer, which was fringed with magenta Post-it notes.

The New Yorker

It seems that there is always someone who just bombs completely in the first episode of a new cycle.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"The bombing completely changed everything.

The New York Times

"To the audience of one, it bombed completely," Mr. Malloch Brown said.

The New York Times

The bomb completely penetrated the ship and exploded directly under her keel.

Wikipedia

That bombing completely tore the heart out of the anti-government movement in the country.

Los Angeles Times

"Doesn't she realize that the $900 billion the country will now be spending on health care will virtually ruin any chance of bombing completely innocent countries, building churches on every street corner, and funding the snacks for our weekly Bridge night?

Huffington Post

At the same time, if you were a doughy, acne-scarred teenager into Death Metal in the early 90s, I'd probably peg you for more the "cruelty to neighbors' pets" type but I wouldn't take suicide bombing completely off the table.

Vice

Among his reasons, he said, was "my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary".

The New York Times

The White House had no specific response, but Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, depicted Biden's public skepticism about the bombing as "completely irresponsible".

The New Yorker

In another memoir, fifteen years later, after his own stint in the White House, Eisenhower wrote, "Japan was already defeated and... dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "bombs completely", ensure the context clearly indicates a total failure or destruction to leverage the phrase's impactful imagery.

Common error

Avoid using "bombs completely" in situations where the failure is minor or doesn't involve a significant degree of impact or destruction. Opt for milder terms like "fails" or "underperforms" in those cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bombs completely" functions as a descriptive expression, indicating a state of utter failure or complete destruction. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct. The examples show usage in describing events or performances that have been entirely unsuccessful.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "bombs completely" is a grammatically sound and emphatic way to describe something that fails utterly. While Ludwig confirms its correctness, its usage is relatively infrequent and often found in news and media contexts or in Wikipedia. When writing, ensure the situation warrants such a strong expression of failure, and consider more formal alternatives like "fails utterly" or "is a complete failure" when a more professional tone is needed. The expert rating reflects its correct grammar and reliable source appearances, tempered by its somewhat limited usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is a complete failure

States directly that something has not succeeded in any way.

fails utterly

Emphasizes complete failure, replacing the imagery of "bombs" with a direct statement of ineffectiveness.

flops entirely

Focuses on the complete lack of success, particularly in performance or reception.

is completely ruined

Focuses on the state of being damaged beyond repair or recovery.

fails spectacularly

Highlights a dramatic and noticeable failure, similar to the impact of a bomb.

collapses entirely

Suggests a complete breakdown or disintegration, applicable to systems or structures.

is a total disaster

Expresses a complete and unfavorable outcome, emphasizing the negative consequences.

totally implodes

Conveys a sudden and internal failure, akin to something collapsing inwards.

comes to nothing

Indicates that all efforts have been wasted, resulting in no positive result.

is a wipeout

Describes a situation where everything is lost or destroyed, similar to a bombing's aftermath.

FAQs

How can I use "bombs completely" in a sentence?

You can use "bombs completely" to describe something that fails utterly or is entirely unsuccessful. For example, "The project "bombs completely", leading to significant losses for the company."

What are some alternatives to "bombs completely"?

Alternatives include "fails utterly", "flops entirely", or "is a complete failure". Choose the alternative that best fits the context and desired level of formality.

Is "bombs completely" grammatically correct?

Yes, "bombs completely" is grammatically correct, though it's relatively informal and emphatic. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical acceptability.

What does it mean when something "bombs completely"?

When something "bombs completely", it means it has failed in a comprehensive and often dramatic way. It suggests a high degree of ineffectiveness or devastation.