Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
blood samples were collected
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "blood samples were collected" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in contexts related to medical, scientific, or research activities where blood samples are taken for analysis or testing. Example: "In the study, blood samples were collected from participants to assess their cholesterol levels."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Blood samples were collected using venipuncture.
Science & Research
Peripheral blood samples were collected before hepatectomy.
Science & Research
Blood samples were collected from all participants for genotyping.
Science & Research
Cord blood samples were collected at delivery.
Blood samples were collected and analyzed.
Blood samples were collected from 1549 animals.
Blood samples were collected Upon venous puncture.
Blood samples were collected by peripheral venipuncture.
Fresh blood samples were collected and analyzed.
Science
After 24 h, blood samples were collected.
Science
Convalescent blood samples were collected from 877 (89.6%).
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a medical or scientific procedure, use "blood samples were collected" to clearly indicate that blood was taken for analysis or study. Be specific about the method of collection (e.g., venipuncture) and the timing of collection to provide a complete picture.
Common error
While "blood samples were collected" is grammatically correct, avoid overusing the passive voice in your writing. Consider using the active voice (e.g., "Researchers collected blood samples") to make your writing more direct and engaging.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "blood samples were collected" functions as a passive construction indicating that a specific action (collection) was performed on the subject (blood samples). Ludwig indicates this is a correct and usable expression in English. It's common in scientific and medical contexts.
Frequent in
Science
80%
Academia
10%
News & Media
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
1%
Wiki
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "blood samples were collected" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression, particularly in scientific, medical, and academic writing. Ludwig confirms its correctness and common usage. While perfectly acceptable, consider varying your sentence structure to avoid overuse of the passive voice. Alternative phrases like "blood specimens were obtained" or "blood was taken" can provide subtle differences in tone or emphasis. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context regarding the collection method and purpose to maintain clarity and precision.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
blood specimens were obtained
Replaces "samples" with "specimens" and "collected" with "obtained", offering a more formal tone.
blood samples were gathered
Replaces "collected" with "gathered", suggesting a less formal tone.
blood was drawn for analysis
Focuses on the action of drawing blood, implying collection for subsequent analysis.
blood was obtained for testing
Highlights the purpose of collection (testing) and uses "obtained" in place of "collected."
blood samples were retrieved
Suggests that blood samples were recovered or fetched from a specific location or storage.
blood was sampled for analysis
Emphasizes the action of sampling blood, again implying collection for analysis, but slightly more concise.
blood was taken from participants
Emphasizes the source of the blood samples (participants).
blood samples were procured
Substitutes "collected" with "procured," suggesting a formal or official acquisition of the samples.
samples of blood were taken
Inverts the structure to emphasize the "samples" and uses "taken" as the verb.
blood was harvested for research
Uses "harvested" to imply a more deliberate and scientific collection process, often in research settings.
FAQs
What is the difference between "blood samples were collected" and "blood samples were taken"?
The phrases "blood samples were collected" and "blood samples were taken" are largely interchangeable. However, "blood samples were collected" may sound slightly more formal or scientific, while "blood samples were taken" is generally more conversational.
What are some alternatives to saying "blood samples were collected"?
You can use alternatives like "blood specimens were obtained", "blood was drawn", or "blood was taken" depending on the context and desired level of formality.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing blood sample collection?
Both active and passive voice can be appropriate. Passive voice ("blood samples were collected") emphasizes the samples, while active voice ("Researchers collected blood samples") emphasizes the collectors. Choose the voice that best suits the focus of your writing.
In what contexts is "blood samples were collected" most commonly used?
The phrase "blood samples were collected" is commonly used in scientific papers, medical reports, and research studies to describe the process of obtaining blood for analysis or testing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested