blatant infringement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "blatant infringement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts or discussions about copyright, patents, or intellectual property violations where the infringement is obvious and undeniable. Example: "The company faced legal action for its blatant infringement of the competitor's trademark."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

But Hasbro sued the brothers last week in New York for "clear and blatant infringement" of its intellectual property, so they decided to pull the plug.

The New York Times - Tech

President Bashar al-Assad's government on Monday harshly condemned a new peace plan proposed by the Arab League, calling it a blatant infringement on Syrian sovereignty and evidence of a "conspiratorial scheme".

The New York Times

"We welcome Vostu into the arena of social games, but blatant infringement of our creative works is not an acceptable business strategy-it is a violation of the law".

The New York Times

The foreign secretary's decision to accuse Israel directly in parliament yesterday reflected both the certainty among British officials of Israeli state involvement, and the anger among diplomats and security officials at such a blatant infringement of British sovereignty.

The Guardian

"We are all students trying to concentrate on our studies, but the action by the guild, in blatant infringement of our rights, and their reluctance to reinstate us, has left us with no alternative," he said.

The Guardian

Jackson again missed the conversion but was accurate from a penalty, awarded when Copeland was sin-binned for a blatant infringement.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

On both counts the authors and publishers accused Google of blatant copyright infringement.

The New York Times - Magazine

After nearly a decade of providing music for free, Grooveshark has closed down, posting a mea culpa on its website apologising for its pretty blatant copyright infringement.

Independent

Objections to this radical revision and blatant copyright infringement came not from Columbia but rather from Cornell's fellow artist Salvador Dali, who accused Cornell of having plagiarized his dreams.

The New York Times - Magazine

China has long been seen as the land of copycats, with open market bins of bootleg DVDs, counterfeit fashion and blatant technology infringement.

TechCrunch

This afternoon they filed a lawsuit alleging "massive and blatant" copyright infringement by Hi5, VideoEgg and ten John Doe defendants to be named later.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing intellectual property theft or rights violations, use "blatant infringement" to emphasize the obvious and intentional nature of the act.

Common error

Avoid using "blatant infringement" in casual conversation or informal writing. This phrase is best suited for formal or legal contexts where precision and emphasis are required.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "blatant infringement" functions as a noun phrase that describes a clear and obvious violation of a right or law, often in the context of intellectual property. As Ludwig AI suggests, it emphasizes the obvious nature of the violation.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "blatant infringement" is a grammatically correct and usable term, primarily employed in formal settings such as legal and business discussions. According to Ludwig AI, it is used to describe a clear and obvious violation, most often related to intellectual property. While synonyms such as "obvious violation" or "clear transgression" exist, "blatant infringement" carries a stronger emphasis on the intentional nature of the act. The phrase appears most frequently in News & Media and Formal & Business contexts, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, and should be used judiciously to maintain a professional tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious violation

Focuses on the clear and easily noticeable nature of the violation, similar to "blatant infringement".

clear transgression

Emphasizes the act of crossing a boundary or limit, highlighting the clarity of the violation.

flagrant violation

Highlights the shocking or outrageous nature of the violation, suggesting a disregard for rules or laws.

evident breach

Stresses the obvious nature of the breach or failure to comply with rules or agreements.

outright contravention

Indicates a direct and unambiguous act of going against a rule or law.

undisguised violation

Highlights the lack of concealment or attempt to hide the violation, making it openly apparent.

patent violation

Similar to 'blatant', it denotes an easily recognizable or obvious infringement.

manifest breach

Emphasizes the clear and undeniable nature of the breach, making it easily apparent.

egregious infringement

Focuses on the shocking or remarkably bad nature of the infringement, suggesting a severe violation.

palpable violation

Indicates a violation that is easily perceived or felt, making it readily apparent.

FAQs

How is "blatant infringement" typically used in a sentence?

"Blatant infringement" is often used to describe violations of intellectual property, such as copyright or patent law. For example, "The company was sued for "blatant infringement" of the artist's copyright".

What are some synonyms for "blatant infringement"?

Alternatives to "blatant infringement" include "obvious violation", "clear transgression", or "flagrant violation". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "blatant infringement" a formal or informal term?

"Blatant infringement" is a more formal term, best suited for legal, business, or academic contexts. Using it in casual conversation might sound overly dramatic.

What's the difference between "blatant infringement" and simple "infringement"?

The word "blatant" emphasizes that the "infringement" is obvious, intentional, and undeniable. "Infringement" alone simply means a violation of a right or law, without necessarily implying that it is obvious.