beings that

USAGE SUMMARY

'beings that' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to introduce a fact that is relevant to the idea presented in the sentence. For example, "Beings that the party is tomorrow night, we need to start planning now."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This last category includes spiritual beings that might be either benevolent or malevolent.

Encyclopedia Britannica

We feel like the animals are not beings that should be ogled or stared at.

Huffington Post

They're distinctive human beings that should be nurtured and appreciated.

Unicef

Only human beings that were living in your house on April 1, 2010 will be counted.

Huffington Post

They're like human beings that way".

The New York Times - Arts

"Thankfully, it's human beings that make TV and human beings that watch them.

The Guardian

And I think they're human beings that are affected.

The New York Times - Sports

"What it did to human beings that day defies description".

The New York Times

There are so many living beings that need what little focused attention we have.

The New York Times

It's not science you have to look at but the human beings that use it".

Independent

Instead, he insisted that he was amanuensis to the multiple beings that dwelled within.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "beings that", ensure the relative clause clearly defines or provides essential information about the beings in question. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the sentence's meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "beings that" with non-essential clauses that merely add extra information. Use "beings, which" instead when the clause is not critical to identifying the beings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "beings that" functions as a relative clause, introducing additional information or characteristics about the noun "beings". It helps to specify or define the type of beings being discussed. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is both correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "beings that" serves as a relative clause to describe or classify entities, often in a neutral to formal register. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability. It's particularly prevalent in news, scientific, and encyclopedic contexts. For clarity, ensure the clause provides essential defining information. Alternatives include "entities that", "creatures that", and "individuals who", depending on the context. As a word of caution, avoid using it in non-essential clauses; opting instead for "beings, which".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lifeforms that

Specifically refers to living organisms, whether known or hypothetical.

entities that

Replaces "beings" with a more formal synonym, suitable for technical or philosophical contexts.

organisms that

Replaces "beings" with a scientific term focusing on living entities.

creatures that

Substitutes "beings" with a term emphasizing biological or fantastical entities.

individuals who

Replaces "beings" with a term specifically referring to people.

presences that

Suggests a perceived or felt existence, often used in supernatural contexts.

those that

A more concise way of referring to a group of beings or entities.

forms that

Emphasizes the shape or appearance of the beings being described.

things that

A broader term that can encompass both living and non-living entities.

existences that

Focuses on the state of being rather than the beings themselves.

FAQs

How can I use "beings that" in a sentence?

Use "beings that" to introduce a defining characteristic or attribute of a group or type of entity. For example, "Animals are "beings that" require care and attention."

What's the difference between "beings that" and "beings who"?

"Beings that" generally refers to all entities, while "beings who" typically refers to people or entities with human-like qualities. Use "beings who" when referring specifically to individuals or persons.

What are some alternatives to using "beings that" in writing?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "entities that", "creatures that", or "organisms that" to add variety to your writing.

Is it ever incorrect to use the phrase "beings that"?

While grammatically correct, "beings that" can sound overly formal in some contexts. In informal writing, consider using simpler alternatives such as "things that" or rephrasing the sentence for clarity.