been traumatic for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "been traumatic for both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or experience that has caused emotional distress or difficulty for two parties involved. Example: "The sudden loss of their mutual friend has been traumatic for both, leaving them struggling to cope with their grief."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The relationship, given the swings of history, has been traumatic for both sides.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Re "A 'Forest Fire of Hair Loss' and Its Emotional Scars" (Patient Voices, July 6): While the emotional impact to losing all body hair is traumatic for both men and women, the focus on a man's experience ignores differences in coping with the illness that women go through.

The New York Times

Abruptly ceasing all nursing sessions can be traumatic for both the baby and moms body, and can even make the mom more susceptible to developing a clogged breast duct, inflammation or the painful breast infection Mastitis.

WikiHow

The last decade has been traumatic for the Russian people.

The New York Times

By all accounts, the last two years have been traumatic for him.

The New York Times

Life has been traumatic for all Americans since Sept. 11.

The New York Times

"It's been traumatic for us all," said Mims Hackett Jr., the mayor of Orange.

The New York Times

But according to Scott, the experience has been traumatic for her.

The New York Times

The transition to a new system seems to have been traumatic for many members.

The New York Times

Emotionally, the experience has been traumatic for all the family but especially for my wife and daughter".

The Guardian - Money

While the trip may have been traumatic for the alligator, by yesterday it was living like a fat cat.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "been traumatic for both", ensure that the context clearly identifies the two parties involved to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "the experience has been traumatic for both the patient and their family."

Common error

Avoid using "been traumatic for both" when a less intense description is more appropriate. Consider if "difficult", "challenging", or "stressful" might better reflect the actual impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "been traumatic for both" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating that a particular event or situation has had a significantly distressing impact on two entities. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "been traumatic for both" is used to describe a shared experience of significant emotional distress or psychological harm, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While grammatically correct, it's crucial to consider the intensity of the language and whether a less emotionally charged alternative might be more appropriate. Usage is relatively rare, primarily found in News & Media and Wiki sources, with more formal contexts being less common. When employing this phrase, ensure the context clearly identifies the involved parties to enhance clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was a harrowing experience for both

Replaces "traumatic" with "harrowing", emphasizing the distressing nature of the experience.

proved difficult for both parties

Substitutes "traumatic" with "difficult", offering a less emotionally charged description.

caused distress to both sides

Replaces "traumatic" with "distress", focusing on the emotional impact on both parties.

affected both adversely

Uses "adversely" to convey a negative impact on both, replacing the more specific "traumatic".

had a negative impact on both

Offers a more general description of a negative impact, rather than highlighting the traumatic nature.

was a trying time for both

Replaces "traumatic" with "trying", indicating a period of difficulty and stress.

created hardship for both

Focuses on the creation of difficulties or suffering for both parties involved.

brought challenges to both

Highlights the challenging nature of the situation for both parties.

inflicted suffering on both

Emphasizes the infliction of pain or distress upon both.

placed a burden on both

Suggests that the situation has imposed a heavy load or responsibility on both parties.

FAQs

How can I use "been traumatic for both" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to describe an event or situation that has caused emotional distress to two entities. For example: "The relocation process has "been traumatic for both" the employees and their families."

What's a less intense alternative to "been traumatic for both"?

Depending on the context, alternatives like "been difficult for both", "been challenging for both", or "been stressful for both" can be used.

Is it grammatically correct to say "been traumatic for both"?

Yes, the phrase "been traumatic for both" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard structure of "has/have been + adjective + for + noun/pronoun".

In what situations is it appropriate to use "been traumatic for both"?

Use this phrase when you want to emphasize that a specific event has caused significant emotional distress or psychological harm to two distinct individuals or groups.