been omitted for readability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "been omitted for readability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when explaining that certain information has been removed to make a text easier to read or understand. Example: "Some technical details have been omitted for readability, allowing the main points to be more accessible to the audience."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Country labels in the x-axis have been omitted for readability purposes.

EPJ Data Science

Also the case with the AMC23 mobile at 60 km/h has been omitted for readability, since the estimation RMS error is similar to the other AMC23 results.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Storing the data is omitted for readability purposes.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

*Last name has been omitted for privacy.

Vice

Error bars are omitted for better readability.

EJNMMI Research

The orange curve in Fig. 1 displays the mean archeomagnetic directions between AD ~1000 and 1550, as computed by Bucur (1994), whose confidence ovals at 95% were omitted for a better readability (the individual archeomagnetic data presently available between AD ~1500 and 1700 are grayed out in Fig. 1; note further that some of them are still unpublished).

Earth, Planets and Space

Note that the resource unit index n is omitted for the sake of readability.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Since we do not consider soft-handover (SHO), serving station is well defined and the subscript can be omitted for the sake of readability.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Note that in the following, operations involving masking of type a+b mod κ are written as a+b, i.e., the modulo parts are omitted for the sake of brevity and readability.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

Some details are omitted for brevity.

Stanford University

Cycles were omitted for simplicity.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "been omitted for readability", ensure the omitted content isn't critical for understanding the core message. Only remove elements that add complexity without adding substantial value.

Common error

Avoid omitting so much information that the text becomes vague or lacks necessary context. While aiming for readability, ensure the core message remains intact and understandable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "been omitted for readability" functions as an explanatory statement, typically found in academic, technical, or journalistic contexts. It justifies the removal of certain details or elements from a text to enhance its comprehensibility. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is suitable and correct in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "been omitted for readability" serves as an explicit explanation for the removal of specific details to enhance comprehension in a text. Ludwig AI affirms the phrase as correct and usable. The phrase is most frequently found in scientific and academic contexts, indicating a preference for clarity over exhaustive detail. When using this phrase, it's crucial to balance readability with the need to maintain essential information, ensuring the core message remains clear and accurate. Alternatives include "removed for clarity" or "excluded for simplicity", offering similar justifications for editorial choices.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

removed for clarity

Focuses on clarity as the reason for removal, using a more direct verb.

excluded for simplicity

Emphasizes simplification as the motive, implying a reduction in complexity.

left out for brevity

Highlights conciseness as the goal, suggesting a shortening of the text.

not included for better understanding

Specifies improved understanding as the objective, making the benefit explicit.

details suppressed for readability

Indicates that specific details have been hidden to enhance readability.

forgoing details to improve readability

Emphasizes the action of foregoing specific details to facilitate readability.

certain elements removed for ease of reading

Highlights that certain elements were removed to make reading more easy.

information redacted for readability

Shows that some specific information was removed to make reading more easy.

content abbreviated to enhance readability

Shows that the content was summarized to make it more readable.

aspects truncated to improve readability

Highlights that some specific aspects were truncated to enhance readability.

FAQs

How can I use "been omitted for readability" in a sentence?

You can use "been omitted for readability" to explain why certain details are missing from a text. For example, "Some technical specifications have "been omitted for readability" to make the document accessible to a wider audience."

What are some alternatives to "been omitted for readability"?

Alternatives include "removed for clarity", "excluded for simplicity", or "left out for brevity", depending on the specific reason for omitting the information.

Is it appropriate to use "been omitted for readability" in formal writing?

Yes, it's appropriate, especially in technical or academic writing where simplifying complex information for a broader audience is necessary. However, ensure the omission doesn't compromise the accuracy or completeness of the information.

When should I NOT use "been omitted for readability"?

Avoid using it if the omitted information is crucial for understanding the core argument or process. If the missing details would significantly impact comprehension or accuracy, it's better to include them, even if it slightly reduces readability.