Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be verified by using
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be verified by using" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing methods or processes for confirming the accuracy or validity of something. Example: "The results of the experiment should be verified by using a control group to ensure reliability."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
15 human-written examples
Computational results can be verified by using experimental platforms.
Science
Neuronal activity can also be verified by using realistic circuits mapped from the theoretical neuronal models.
Further, chaotic motion can be verified by using Lyapunov exponent and Lyapunov dimension.
If doubtful results are obtained, the substance identity can be verified by using the retention sample.
Dissipativity can be verified by using the fact that V is dissipative.
Then (2.1) and (2.2) can easily be verified by using iteration and the one variable proofs given in [5].
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
45 human-written examples
The stability of controller is verified by using Lyapunov theory.
Some results are verified by using finite element analysis.
Science
The developed model was verified by using various statistical tests.
Science
Further, the chaotic behavior is verified by using Lyapunov exponents.
These results are verified by using Monte Carlo simulations on two example systems.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing scientific reports, ensure that you clearly state the methods used to verify your results using the phrase "be verified by using" to maintain clarity and rigor.
Common error
Avoid assuming that one method of verification is sufficient for all contexts. The choice of verification method should align with the specific requirements and standards of the field or application. Consider additional verification methods or combining multiple approaches if necessary to guarantee high reliability.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be verified by using" functions as a passive construction indicating a method of confirmation or validation. It is commonly used in scientific and technical writing to describe how a result, method, or theory is checked for accuracy or reliability, as validated by Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
98%
Formal & Business
1%
News & Media
1%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "be verified by using" is a grammatically correct and common expression, particularly within scientific and technical domains. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to describe methods for confirming the accuracy or validity of findings. To enhance clarity and precision, remember to adapt your language to the specific context and consider if a more specific term like "validated" or "substantiated" might be more fitting. While largely correct, in scientific writings, ensuring an accurate representation of methodology is key.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be validated through the use of
This alternative emphasizes the act of validating and specifies that it's done through a certain means.
be confirmed via
This option is more concise and uses "via" to indicate the method of confirmation.
be substantiated by means of
This phrase is more formal and emphasizes proving the truth or validity of something.
be corroborated with
This option focuses on supporting a statement or theory with evidence.
be authenticated by
This alternative highlights establishing something as genuine.
be checked with the aid of
This is a more explicit way to talk about using tools or procedures to ensure accuracy.
be verified via application of
This version adds a level of formality, particularly suitable when describing methodologies.
be proven through
This emphasizes demonstrating the truth of something via a particular method.
be tested utilizing
It specifies testing as the means of verification, implying a controlled evaluation.
undergo verification by application of
This is the most verbose and formal option, suitable for highly technical contexts.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "be verified by using" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, you can use phrases like "be substantiated by means of" or "be corroborated with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
What's the difference between "be verified by using" and "be validated by using"?
While similar, "verified" emphasizes confirming accuracy, while "validated" suggests confirming that something meets specific requirements or standards. Both are acceptable and depend on context, but consider if confirming accuracy or adherence to a standard is most important.
Is "be verified by using" suitable for informal writing?
While grammatically correct, "be verified by using" might sound too formal for casual writing. Consider using simpler alternatives such as "be checked by using" or "be confirmed by using" in informal contexts.
How to use "be verified by using" in a sentence?
You can use it to describe how something is checked or confirmed, for example: "The results of the simulation can "be verified by using" experimental data."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested