Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be trusted with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'be trusted with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone is allowed or believed to look after or take care of something. Example sentence: Mary was trusted with the task of organizing the school's fundraiser.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
be entrusted with
be given the responsibility of
be authorized to handle
be considered reliable enough for
be deemed fit to
have the confidence to
be in charge of
be appointed to
be secured with
be suggested with
be guaranteed with
be assured with
be insulated with
be tested with
be sheltered with
be demonstrated with
be acknowledged with
be attested with
be credited with
be requested with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
CAN voters be trusted with democracy?
News & Media
Can voters be trusted with this truth?
News & Media
(An amnesiac cannot be trusted with gold).
News & Media
Could they be trusted with us?
News & Media
Public managers can't be trusted with figures.
News & Media
Who can be trusted with nuclear weapons?
News & Media
Can more-modern Jews be trusted with it?
News & Media
Can researchers be trusted with a cabinet full of drugs?
News & Media
Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?
News & Media
Quite simply, Karl Rove cannot be trusted with classified information.
News & Media
Can Muslims be trusted with a mosque in Bendigo?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "be trusted with", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being entrusted and why the person is considered trustworthy. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the statement's impact.
Common error
Avoid using "be trusted with" when the situation involves routine tasks or responsibilities that don't inherently require a high degree of trust. Overusing it can dilute its meaning and make your writing sound insincere.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be trusted with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone is the recipient of trust or confidence. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It's used to show that an individual or entity is considered reliable enough to handle a specific task, responsibility, or piece of information.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
20%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Science
8%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
7%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "be trusted with" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to convey confidence and responsibility. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively communicates that someone is considered reliable enough to handle a specific task or information. Its prevalence in news, business, and academic contexts demonstrates its versatility and neutral tone. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly defines what is being entrusted and why the individual is deemed trustworthy. While alternatives like "be entrusted with" exist, "be trusted with" remains a straightforward and widely accepted choice. The sources analyzed provide a solid foundation for understanding its varied applications.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be entrusted with
A more formal synonym, often used in official contexts.
be given the responsibility of
Focuses on the duty or obligation associated with the task.
be authorized to handle
Highlights the official permission to manage something.
be considered reliable enough for
Emphasizes the reliability aspect of the person being trusted.
be deemed fit to
Focuses on the suitability and competence for a specific task.
have the confidence to
Highlights the trust placed in someone's abilities.
be allowed to manage
Emphasizes the permission granted to oversee something.
be in charge of
Focuses on the managerial aspect of the task.
be appointed to
Highlights the formal assignment to a role or duty.
be delegated the task of
Emphasizes the act of delegating a specific task to someone.
FAQs
How can I use "be trusted with" in a sentence?
The phrase "be trusted with" indicates that someone is considered reliable and responsible enough to handle something important. For example, "She was "be trusted with" the company's finances" implies she's a trustworthy person.
What are some alternatives to "be trusted with"?
Alternatives to "be trusted with" include phrases like "be entrusted with", "be given the responsibility of", or "be authorized to handle". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "be trusted with" or "be entrusted with"?
"Be entrusted with" is a more formal alternative to "be trusted with". While both are grammatically correct, "be entrusted with" might be more appropriate in official or serious contexts.
What's the difference between "be trusted with" and "have faith in"?
"Be trusted with" usually refers to a specific task or responsibility that someone is deemed capable of handling. "Have faith in", on the other hand, expresses a general belief in someone's abilities or character. You might "have faith in" someone's judgment, but they "be trusted with" managing a project.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested