be too computationally expensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be too computationally expensive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the cost or resource requirements of a computational task or algorithm, particularly in fields like computer science or data analysis. Example: "The proposed algorithm may be too computationally expensive for our current hardware capabilities."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

A more complete joint model incorporating all frequency/altitude/replicate combinations was attempted but found to be too computationally expensive.

Mathematics-in-Industry Case Studies

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Until now such simulations were too computationally expensive.

Journal of Computational Physics

Computational fluid dynamics models (CFD) are too computationally expensive to implement in a control algorithm.

Applied Thermal Engineering

This approach is too computationally expensive to be a viable simulation tool capable of addressing all waste-package locations in the repository.

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

While the hair will ultimately be rendered in glorious high-definition and with detailed physics, it's too computationally expensive to do that while composing the scene.

TechCrunch

DCNs didn't scale well, requiring a lot of bandwidth, and the proofs needed for mixnets were too computationally expensive to keep latency low.

TechCrunch

Genetic Algorithm (GA) has been one of the most popular methods for many challenging optimization problems when exact approaches are too computationally expensive.

Journal of Computational Design and Engineering

Though this detailed model provides a high resolution representation of the rotary reactor performance, it is too computationally expensive for studies that require multiple model evaluations.

Applied Energy

In this presentation, an improvement on existing methods for SA of complex computer models is described for use when the model is too computationally expensive for a standard Monte-Carlo analysis.

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

The paper is devoted to develop efficient domain decomposition methods for the linear Schrödinger equation beyond the semiclassical regime, which does not carry a small enough rescaled Planck constant for asymptotic methods (e.g. geometric optics) to produce a good accuracy, but which is too computationally expensive if direct methods (e.g. finite difference) are applied.

Journal of Computational Physics

One-mm spacing was too computationally expensive.

Cerebral Cortex

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing computational limitations, specify why a process is "be too computationally expensive". For example, mention constraints like hardware limitations, time constraints, or budget limitations.

Common error

Avoid using "be too computationally expensive" as a generic excuse. Always provide specific details about why a particular computation exceeds practical resource limits.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be too computationally expensive" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a subject (such as an algorithm, model, or process) as having a level of computational cost that is prohibitive or impractical. As shown in Ludwig, the phrase indicates a limitation on the practicality of implementation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be too computationally expensive" is a common descriptor in technical and scientific fields, indicating that a process demands impractical levels of computing resources. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent use in contexts related to science and technology. When using this phrase, providing specific reasons for the excessive cost enhances clarity. For situations where "be too computationally expensive" feels overused, alternatives like "require excessive computational resources" or "demand substantial processing power" offer nuanced ways to convey the same meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

require excessive computational resources

Focuses on the resources needed, highlighting the excessiveness.

demand substantial processing power

Emphasizes the power needed to perform the computation.

be prohibitively expensive to compute

Highlights the prohibitive cost associated with the computation.

entail significant computational overhead

Focuses on the overhead and resources that needs to be considered.

pose a high computational burden

Emphasizes the burden or load on the computational system.

be computationally infeasible

Highlights the impossibility of performing the computation within practical constraints.

be too resource-intensive

Highlights that the task consumes large amounts of resources.

necessitate extensive computing time

Focuses on the long processing time needed.

exceed practical computational limits

Emphasizes the task is too much for the current limits.

be computationally challenging

Highlights the challenging requirements of the task.

FAQs

How can I use "be too computationally expensive" in a sentence?

You can use "be too computationally expensive" to describe an algorithm or process that requires excessive computational resources, making it impractical to implement. For example: "The full simulation would "be too computationally expensive" for our current hardware."

What are some alternatives to "be too computationally expensive"?

Alternatives include "require excessive computational resources", "demand substantial processing power", or "be prohibitively expensive to compute", depending on the specific context.

When is a computational task considered "be too computationally expensive"?

A task is considered "be too computationally expensive" when the resources (time, memory, processing power) required to complete it are impractical or infeasible given available technology or budget.

Is it better to say "be computationally expensive" or "be too computationally expensive"?

Using "be too computationally expensive" emphasizes that the computational cost is a significant limiting factor, making it impractical. "Be computationally expensive" simply acknowledges high cost without necessarily implying infeasibility. The addition of "too" is used to suggest that some optimization or alternative approach needs to be used.