Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be suffocated

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be suffocated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is experiencing a lack of air or is overwhelmed by something, either literally or metaphorically. Example: "In the crowded room, I felt as if I might be suffocated by the heat and the noise."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

I didn't want to be suffocated.

They can easily be suffocated by organic matter.

It can be quite overwhelming there, you can be suffocated with praise.

News & Media

Independent

The poor boy in vain shrieked that he was about to be suffocated.

You would be suffocated sometimes, and they hit you with electricity and guns.

News & Media

The Guardian

He had to play his hand, somehow, or the relationship would be suffocated into extinction.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

It can be comforting, but it can also be suffocating.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Don't be suffocating.

Initiative is suffocated.

News & Media

Independent

She had been suffocated.

News & Media

The New York Times

He was suffocated.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be suffocated" in a metaphorical sense, ensure the context clearly establishes the comparison. For example, "be suffocated by bureaucracy" implies excessive and stifling rules.

Common error

Avoid using "be suffocated" too frequently in metaphorical contexts. Overuse can weaken the impact and make your writing seem repetitive. Vary your language with synonyms like "stifled" or "overwhelmed" to maintain reader engagement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be suffocated" primarily functions as a passive verb phrase. It describes the state of being deprived of oxygen or being overwhelmed by something, as seen in examples from Ludwig, where someone might "be suffocated by anxiety" or "be suffocated by history."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

18%

Science

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Academia

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be suffocated" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating a state of being deprived of air or overwhelmed by something, either literally or metaphorically. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and usable in a variety of contexts. It is most frequently found in news and media sources, but also appears in wikis and scientific publications. When using this phrase, consider the context to ensure the comparison is clear and avoid overuse in metaphorical senses. Related phrases include "be smothered", "be stifled", and "be overwhelmed", providing alternative ways to express similar ideas.

FAQs

How can I use "be suffocated" in a sentence?

You can use "be suffocated" in sentences like, "The plants will "be suffocated" if the soil is too dense" or "She felt she would "be suffocated" by her overbearing family".

What are some synonyms for "be suffocated"?

Alternatives to "be suffocated" include "be smothered", "be stifled", "be choked", or "be asphyxiated". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "be suffocated by" something?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The preposition "by" is commonly used to indicate the cause or agent of the suffocation, whether literal or metaphorical. For example, "be suffocated by smoke" or "be suffocated by regulations".

What's the difference between "be suffocated" and "be stifled"?

While both imply a form of suppression, ""be suffocated"" often refers to a more direct lack of air or overwhelming force. ""be stifled"" typically suggests a more gradual suppression or inhibition, often in a metaphorical sense (e.g., stifled creativity).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: