Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be reviewed against
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be reviewed against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of evaluating something in relation to specific criteria or standards. Example: "The project outcomes will be reviewed against the initial objectives to assess success."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
Once set, a new enrollment target will stay in place for three years, and then be reviewed against program outcomes.
Applications for more licences to sell alcohol should be reviewed against a background of considering public health and street crime; we must reduce the availability of alcohol by reducing the number of places selling it.
News & Media
In early 2012, journalists were assured that this is not the case, but the Guardian's deletions procedure will need to be reviewed against the broad principles of the new policy.
News & Media
It should be noted, too, that federal regulations require that guidelines be reviewed against current evidence at least every five years and so they were supported by the NGC for a full five years after their expiration date and nearly seven years after their expiration date by the CDC.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Returned articles were reviewed against inclusion and exclusion criteria by three reviewers (D.G., K.E., and P.C).
Science
Retrieved citations were reviewed against the question-specific inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers.
The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.
Science
The whole process represents an MBO program of textbook purity: each staff member, patient, and patient category (e.g., alcoholics) has objectives for both diagnosis and treatment, which are reviewed against actual results every three months.
News & Media
These units were reviewed against the current safety practices and based on this review some recommendations are made to bring the safety levels of these vintage units on par with the recently authorized plants.
To check the trueness of this result, it was reviewed against the theoretically calculated values and it was observed that the optimized result was similar to the theoretical one.
Science
All included studies were reviewed against the PEDro appraisal tool.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "be reviewed against", clearly state the criteria against which something is being evaluated to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The proposal will be reviewed against the project's objectives".
Common error
Avoid using "be reviewed against" without specifying the criteria. For example, instead of saying "The application will be reviewed against", clarify it by stating "The application will be reviewed against the eligibility requirements".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be reviewed against" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject is undergoing evaluation in relation to specific criteria. This is supported by Ludwig, which confirms the phrase's correctness and usability.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
10%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "be reviewed against" is a grammatically correct and usable passive construction that is employed to indicate that something is being evaluated in relation to specific criteria. Ludwig's analysis and examples highlight its use in formal and scientific contexts to clearly specify the standards used in the evaluation process. While "be reviewed against" might appear in news and media, it is important to clearly state what the criteria are to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "be evaluated against" or "be assessed in relation to", depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be evaluated against
Replaces "reviewed" with a synonym that suggests a more formal assessment.
be assessed in relation to
Uses a different prepositional phrase to indicate the comparison standard.
be checked against
Offers a less formal synonym for "reviewed", implying a simpler verification process.
be compared with
Emphasizes the act of contrasting two items or sets of criteria.
be measured against
Suggests a quantifiable comparison using specific metrics.
be benchmarked against
Implies comparing against an industry standard or best practice.
be tested against
Highlights a rigorous process of verification to meet standards.
be scrutinized in light of
Indicates a thorough and critical examination considering certain factors.
be judged by
Focuses on the act of forming an opinion based on criteria.
be weighed against
Implies carefully considering the importance of different criteria in the evaluation.
FAQs
How do I use "be reviewed against" in a sentence?
Use "be reviewed against" to indicate that something is being evaluated or assessed in relation to a specific set of standards or criteria. For instance, "The data will "be reviewed against" the established guidelines".
What phrases are similar to "be reviewed against"?
Similar phrases include "be evaluated against", "be assessed in relation to", and "be checked against", all of which convey the idea of assessment against a standard.
Is it better to say "be reviewed against" or "be reviewed with"?
"Be reviewed against" is generally preferred when you are specifying the criteria or standards used in the evaluation. "Be reviewed with" is less common and might imply the use of something (like a tool) during the review process, rather than the criteria themselves.
What does "be reviewed against" imply in a formal context?
In a formal context, "be reviewed against" implies a structured and systematic evaluation process where specific criteria are used to assess the subject. This suggests a transparent and objective approach to the assessment.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested