be restricted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be restricted for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey limitations or constraints regarding something, but it is not commonly used in this form. Example: "Access to the database may be restricted for certain users based on their roles."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Travel continues to be restricted for locals and especially foreigners.

The Guardian

And leave time will be restricted for 1,800 firefighters and emergency medical workers.

The Washington Post

Spending would be restricted for corporations that have major government contracts or foreign controls.

The New York Times

Files marked "confidential," "confidential draft," or "staff only," will be restricted for 10 years after presumed creation unless otherwise noted.

Cornell University

Financial information such as payment and donation amounts will be restricted for 25 years after such transactions occurred.

Cornell University

For structures of high complexity, their components accessibility can be restricted, for instance internal equipments or panels.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

But it said there was some evidence that the availability of nonengineered crops "may be restricted for some farmers".

The New York Times

R-rated movies are supposed to be restricted for viewers under 17, and 90percentt of the students surveyed were younger than 14.

The New York Times - Health

Lockup provisions are common in initial public offerings, providing some assurance to buyers that the supply of shares will be restricted for some period.

The New York Times

Mr. Lonegan says they should be restricted for use in schools in the same town where the student lives, lest better districts siphon off students, leaving empty schools.

The New York Times

Executive Director and administration correspondence and Board of Directors files will be restricted for a number of years still to be determined.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace the phrase "be restricted for" with more common alternatives like "be limited to" or "be designated for" to ensure your message is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid using "be restricted for" when a more precise preposition is needed. Instead of saying "access is restricted for users", consider "access is restricted to users" to indicate the specific group with access restrictions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be restricted for" functions as a passive construction indicating that something is subject to limitations or constraints. However, according to Ludwig AI, this is not correct in standard written English, and more precise alternatives should be used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

36%

Academia

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be restricted for" appears frequently across various sources, including news, academic, and scientific domains. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is not correct in standard written English. Therefore, while it's commonly used, it's advisable to use more precise alternatives like "be limited to" or "be designated for" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity. It is important to note that the intended meaning is to indicate limitations or constraints, but standard English prefers other phrasing options to achieve this.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be limited to

Focuses on specifying the boundaries within which something can exist or operate.

be subject to restrictions

Highlights the state of being under certain limitations or rules.

be governed by limitations

Emphasizes that limitations dictate the actions that occur.

have constraints imposed on

Indicates that external forces are applying the restrictions.

be under certain constraints

Highlights the existing restrictions.

fall under restrictions

Indicates something is categorized within a set of existing limitations.

be exclusively for

Expresses a singular focus, implying the exclusion of all others.

be designated for

Denotes a specific purpose or intended recipient, limiting general use.

be earmarked for

Highlights a specific allocation, restricting use for other purposes.

be solely for

Emphasizes that something is only intended for one particular use or recipient.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "be restricted for"?

You can use alternatives like "be limited to", "be designated for", or "be earmarked for" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to use "be restricted for"?

While the phrase "be restricted for" appears in various sources, it is not considered standard English. More precise and grammatically correct alternatives are generally preferred.

How can I use "be limited to" instead of "be restricted for"?

Instead of saying "access might be restricted for high-level donors", you could say "access might be limited to high-level donors".

What is the difference between "be restricted to" and "be restricted for"?

"Be restricted to" is the more commonly accepted phrasing, indicating the limits or boundaries something has. "Be restricted for", while found in some sources, is less standard. For example, say "access is restricted to authorized personnel" instead of "access is restricted for authorized personnel".