be earmarked for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be earmarked for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is designated or set aside for a specific purpose or recipient. Example: "The funds will be earmarked for the new community center project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The less good might be earmarked for cuts.

The Guardian

Funds would also be earmarked for emergency obstetric services.

The Guardian

Half the money would be earmarked for that purpose.

The New York Times

Part of the money saved by removing Trident from Scottish waters would be earmarked for childcare.

Independent

(Smaller dollops of cash are to be earmarked for roads and ports).

The Economist

The final £300m a year could yet be earmarked for other policies.

The Guardian

Mr. Rendell pledged that money from privatization would be earmarked for transportation.

The New York Times

Many knitters have asked if their sweaters may be earmarked for Afghanistan.

The New York Times

As much as £50m could be earmarked for external programme providers.

The Guardian

The money will be earmarked for programs in 22 developing countries.

The New York Times

The money would be earmarked for the purchase of undeveloped land.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal contexts, consider using "be designated for" as a more precise alternative to "be earmarked for".

Common error

Avoid using "be earmarked for" in casual conversations or informal writing; opt for simpler alternatives like "be for" or "be going to" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be earmarked for" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that something is specifically designated or reserved for a particular purpose. It is often used in formal contexts to denote the intended use of resources or funds. Ludwig provides numerous examples confirming its widespread use in various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Formal & Business

18%

Science

10%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be earmarked for" is a commonly used and grammatically sound expression that signifies a specific designation of resources or funds for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent occurrence in news, business, and scientific contexts. While versatile, it's best suited for professional and neutral settings, with alternatives available for more casual conversations. Understanding its function and purpose will help ensure clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be designated for

Focuses on the act of officially assigning something for a particular purpose.

be intended for

Highlights the planned or expected use of something.

be allocated to

Emphasizes the distribution of resources among various recipients.

be set aside for

Highlights the act of reserving something for a specific future use.

be reserved for

Similar to 'set aside', but implies a more formal or exclusive reservation.

be assigned to

Focuses on the act of giving someone or something a specific task or purpose.

be devoted to

Implies a strong commitment of resources or effort towards a particular cause.

be put towards

A more informal way of saying resources are being used for a specific goal.

be apportioned to

Emphasizes the fair or proportional distribution of resources.

be consigned to

Suggests a less desirable or final allocation.

FAQs

How can I use "be earmarked for" in a sentence?

"Be earmarked for" is used to indicate that something, usually money or resources, is designated for a specific purpose. For example, "The funds will be earmarked for the new community center project".

What are some alternatives to "be earmarked for"?

Alternatives include "be designated for", "be allocated to", or "be set aside for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "earmarked" only used in the context of money?

While often used in financial contexts, "be earmarked for" can also apply to other resources, like time, space, or personnel, that are designated for a particular purpose. For example, "This room will be earmarked for storage".

What's the difference between "be earmarked for" and "be intended for"?

"Be earmarked for" implies a formal allocation or designation, whereas "be intended for" suggests a planned or expected use that might not be officially confirmed. Earmarking carries a stronger sense of commitment.