Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be mentioned with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be mentioned with" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something should be referenced alongside something else, but it is not commonly used. Example: "In the report, the new policy should be mentioned with the previous regulations for clarity."
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
37 human-written examples
Just to be mentioned with those guys is an honour".
News & Media
"He's going to be mentioned with all the best quarterbacks.
News & Media
There's one last irony that should be mentioned with regard to Turkey.
News & Media
"It's a totally different situation, although I'm honored to be mentioned with him," Smoltz said.
News & Media
Nichols' recollections are similarly tinged with waspishness: "Tom was a great figure in Bristol, to be mentioned with bated breath.
News & Media
"I think Warren has the potential to be mentioned with all the greats -- Joe Greene and Jerome, Caesarr said.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
23 human-written examples
Coke is mentioned with only faint praise.
Academia
Bank bail-outs are mentioned, with a grimace.
News & Media
The names are mentioned with the page numbers in which they appear in the publication.
"My name is mentioned with malfeasance, with lying, with so many things.
News & Media
If my name is mentioned with Kareem or Wilt, that's the ultimate".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing, consider if a stronger verb might add more precision. Alternatives like "be associated with", "be compared to", or "be ranked alongside" might be more appropriate depending on the specific context.
Common error
While "be mentioned with" isn't inherently wrong, it relies on the passive voice. Overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak or vague. Consider rephrasing to use a more active voice, such as "critics often mention X with Y" for a more direct and engaging style.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be mentioned with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject is being referenced or considered alongside another. It often implies comparison, association, or inclusion. Ludwig AI suggests it's grammatically acceptable but may not always be the most stylistically strong choice.
Frequent in
News & Media
52%
Science
26%
Encyclopedias
7%
Less common in
Academia
7%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "be mentioned with" is a commonly used but somewhat passive construction indicating that a subject is being referenced alongside another, often implying a comparison or association. Ludwig AI considers it grammatically acceptable, but suggests that more active or precise alternatives might be preferable depending on the context. Common usages appear in news and media, science, and encyclopedic content. When using this phrase, consider whether a more active verb or a more specific connection would enhance the clarity and impact of your writing, avoiding the overuse of passive voice.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be associated with
Focuses on a general connection or relationship, not necessarily on being spoken about together.
be compared to
Highlights the act of comparing something to something else, emphasizing similarities and differences.
be grouped with
Emphasizes the act of categorizing or placing items together based on shared characteristics.
be included among
Highlights inclusion within a larger set or category.
be ranked alongside
Indicates a position in a hierarchy or order, emphasizing comparative value or merit.
be classed with
Implies categorization, often in a formal or technical context.
be considered with
Focuses on thinking about or evaluating something in conjunction with something else.
be listed with
Highlights a formal listing or enumeration.
be named with
Simple alternative that highlights the mention of names together.
be spoken of with
Changes focus to the act of speaking, emphasizing how something is discussed.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "be mentioned with" to sound more active?
Consider alternatives like "is associated with", "is compared to", or "is ranked alongside". These options often provide a more direct and engaging tone than the passive construction of "be mentioned with".
What does it imply when someone or something "is mentioned with" another?
Generally, it suggests a comparison, association, or shared characteristic between the subjects. The context typically provides further details about the nature of this relationship.
Is it grammatically correct to say "be mentioned with"?
Yes, it's grammatically acceptable. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, other options may offer more precision or stylistic flair. The choice depends on the desired emphasis and the overall tone of your writing.
What are some common contexts where "be mentioned with" is used?
As seen in the examples, "be mentioned with" is frequently used in sports reporting, literary analysis, and discussions of historical or cultural figures. It serves to draw parallels or connections between different entities.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested