be large enough to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be large enough to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a size requirement or capacity that must be met for something to function or be effective. Example: "The container must be large enough to hold all the materials needed for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It needs to be large enough to be meaningful.

The New Yorker

But it would be large enough to fit the "Sphere".

The New York Times

Some can be large enough to swallow entire buildings.

Independent

The subarray must be large enough to encompass both HEG and MEG "arms".

Harvard University

T must be large enough to accommodate the maximum number of streams we expect to handle.

Stanford University

The square must be large enough to contain the entire leaf.

Cornell University

It should be large enough to accommodate the largest actual delay requested at run-time.

Stanford University

Letters should be large enough to read from the back of the classroom.

Yale University

***Note: Interval should be large enough to allow for 2 spikes (for each signal).

Yale University

This phenomenon may be large enough to cause the damage in composite panels.

Composite Structures

The solar power would be large enough to supply many commuters' needs.

Journal of Power Sources

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be large enough to", ensure the context clearly defines what the subject needs to accommodate or achieve. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "be large enough to" without specifying the required dimension or capacity. For instance, instead of saying 'The room must be large enough', specify 'The room must "be large enough to" accommodate 20 people'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be large enough to" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun or pronoun, indicating that something possesses the necessary dimensions or capacity to achieve a specific purpose. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which finds examples across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

32%

Academia

23%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be large enough to" is a versatile expression used to indicate that something meets a necessary size requirement. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide applicability across various domains, including science, news, academia, and everyday instructions. Remember to specify the context of the size requirement to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "sufficiently big to" or "ample enough to" can add nuance, but "be large enough to" remains a clear and reliable choice for conveying minimum size requirements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently big to

Emphasizes adequacy in size, replacing "large" with its synonym "big".

big enough for

Replaces the infinitive with a preposition, suggesting suitability.

ample enough to

Replaces "large" with "ample", indicating more than sufficient size.

substantial enough to

Emphasizes the significant size needed for a purpose.

of adequate size to

Uses a more formal tone to describe having the necessary size.

large adequate for

Highlights suitability in size, replacing the infinitive with a preposition.

of sufficient magnitude to

Replaces "large" with "magnitude", used for something huge.

generous enough to

It indicates a size that is larger than strictly necessary.

roomy enough to

Highlights the spaciousness and comfort provided by the size.

expansive enough to

Suggests a widespread or extensive area.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "be large enough to"?

You can use alternatives like "sufficiently big to", "big enough for", or "ample enough to" depending on the context.

What does "be large enough to" mean?

The phrase "be large enough to" indicates that something has the necessary size or capacity to fulfill a specific requirement or purpose. It implies a size threshold that must be met.

Is it more appropriate to use "be large enough to" or "large adequate for"?

"Be large enough to" is generally more common and grammatically standard. "large adequate for" is less conventional and might sound awkward in many contexts.

Can "be large enough to" be used in formal writing?

Yes, "be large enough to" is suitable for formal writing. However, for a more sophisticated tone, consider using phrases like "of adequate size to" or "substantial enough to".