be interfered with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be interfered with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where something is obstructed or disrupted by an external factor. Example: "The project cannot proceed if it continues to be interfered with by external influences."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These are not to be interfered with".

Encyclopedia Britannica

"He doesn't need to be interfered with.

The New York Times - Sports

The constitution will be interfered with to impose pension cuts.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is too important to be interfered with".

The New Yorker

And even evidence that might in principle be uncontaminated can be interfered with by the state.

The Guardian

Vacation, the court said, "is a very important benefit, which should not be interfered with lightly".

The New York Times

There seems to be a view that the judiciary are independent and cannot be interfered with.

Independent

Beyond that, there is a suspicion that our political processes have been compromised, and could be interfered with.

The New Yorker

The cities were guaranteed only in general terms that their old privileges should not be interfered with.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Freedom of expression should only be interfered with where there is a pressing social need to protect the rights of others.

The Guardian

"As the blog got more popular, updating it as frequently as a news and current affairs site needs to be, interfered with my real work.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "be interfered with" to clearly indicate an external obstruction or disruption impacting something.

Common error

Avoid using "be interfered with" in sentences where a more direct verb like "disrupt" or "hinder" would be clearer and more concise. For example, instead of "The signal was interfered with", try "The signal was disrupted."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be interfered with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something is receiving interference from an external source. As Ludwig AI suggests, it denotes obstruction or disruption. The examples show a variety of contexts where this phrase is applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

5%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be interfered with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive construction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it effectively conveys that something is being obstructed or disrupted. Its usage spans across various contexts, including science, news, and encyclopedias. While versatile, it's important to use it judiciously, ensuring clarity and conciseness in writing. Alternative phrases like ""be disrupted by"" or ""be hindered by"" may sometimes offer more precise descriptions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be disrupted by

Focuses on the interruption of a process or activity.

be hindered by

Emphasizes the slowing down or prevention of progress.

be obstructed by

Suggests a physical or metaphorical barrier.

be hampered by

Implies difficulty in proceeding due to an obstacle.

be impeded by

Highlights the slowing or prevention of movement or progress.

be compromised by

Suggests a weakening or undermining of integrity or effectiveness.

be affected by

Indicates an influence or impact, often negative.

be influenced by

Focuses on the power to change or affect someone or something.

be tainted by

Suggests contamination or corruption.

be marred by

Emphasizes damage or disfigurement.

FAQs

How can I use "be interfered with" in a sentence?

You can use "be interfered with" to indicate that something is being obstructed or disrupted by an external factor. For example: "The experiment cannot proceed if it continues to "be interfered with" by external influences."

What are some alternatives to "be interfered with"?

Alternatives include "be disrupted by", "be hindered by", or "be obstructed by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "interfered with" or "disrupted by"?

Both "interfered with" and "disrupted by" are grammatically correct, but "disrupted by" may be more appropriate when the disruption is significant or causes a complete break in the activity. "Interfered with" suggests a more subtle obstruction.

What is the difference between "be interfered with" and "be affected by"?

"Be affected by" implies a change or influence, while "be interfered with" specifically suggests an obstruction or disruption. Something can "be affected by" many factors, but it is only "be interfered with" when something actively hinders its progress or function.