be grouped under

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be grouped under" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when categorizing or classifying items, concepts, or information into specific groups or categories. Example: "These species can be grouped under the category of endangered animals."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There is a lot of what can be grouped under the term American Impressionism.

The New York Times

Should Women's Agency and Racial/Ethnic/Indigenous Justice be grouped under the larger heading of Inclusion?

The New Yorker

The divisions must not be grouped under more than two army corps headquarters staffs.

Yale University

Ms. Larko, 50, paints subjects that might be grouped under the heading of urban blight.

The New York Times

These might roughly be grouped under four heads: thematic, religious, intellectual, and fictionalized.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Some may be grouped under the head of structural change (resulting from changes in tastes, habits, institutions, technology, etc.).

Britannica

Some may be grouped under the head of structural change (resulting from changes in tastes, habits, institutions, technology, etc).

Encyclopedia Britannica

This form of "evil" can be grouped under three headings: "blood libel, the conspiracy libel, and the economic libel".

Independent

In spite of this diversity, many of the tools of systems theory can be grouped under a few major headings.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Cemex is also seeking to broaden its sales of information technology and Internet-based consulting services, which will be grouped under the new unit.

The New York Times

On Friday and Saturday nights, and three more times thereafter, a varying assortment of these premieres will be grouped under the title "All New".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be grouped under", ensure the categories are clearly defined and mutually exclusive to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "be grouped under" if the categories are not distinct or have significant overlap. This can lead to confusion and inaccurate classification. Instead, consider using broader terms like "related to" or "associated with" if clear categorization is not possible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be grouped under" functions as a passive verb phrase used to categorize or classify items, concepts, or information into specific groups or headings. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability, as shown in numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

29%

Encyclopedias

14%

Less common in

Academia

7%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be grouped under" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for categorizing items or concepts. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is suitable for various contexts, including science, news, and encyclopedic content. To enhance clarity, ensure categories are distinct and mutually exclusive. Alternatives like "be categorized as" or "fall under the umbrella of" can be used depending on the desired level of formality and precision. Ludwig’s examples confirm that the phrase is valid and effective across a range of professional and academic domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be categorized as

This alternative directly replaces "grouped under" with "categorized as", emphasizing a formal classification.

be classified within

Using "classified within" suggests a more structured and systematic categorization process.

be included in the class of

This option specifies "class" for more specificity and is suitable when dealing with biological or scientific classifications.

fall under the umbrella of

This phrase uses a metaphorical expression to indicate inclusion within a broader category.

be subsumed under

"Subsumed under" implies a hierarchical relationship where something is included within a larger, more general category.

be incorporated into

This emphasizes the act of integrating something into a larger system or group.

be considered as part of

This phrase broadens the scope slightly, focusing on membership or inclusion.

be listed within

"Listed within" suggests an organized or enumerated inclusion in a particular grouping.

be arranged within

Similar to 'listed within', this suggests arrangement or organization of items in a group.

be assembled into

This alternative shifts the focus to the action of assembling items into a group.

FAQs

How do I use "be grouped under" in a sentence?

You can use "be grouped under" to classify items, concepts, or information into specific categories. For example, "These symptoms can "be grouped under" the heading of anxiety disorders."

What are some alternatives to "be grouped under"?

Alternatives include "be categorized as", "be classified within", or "fall under the umbrella of" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "be grouped under" or "be classified as"?

Both phrases are correct, but "be classified as" implies a more formal or scientific categorization, while "be grouped under" can be used in more general contexts. For example, use "be classified as" when discussing the scientific classification of species.

What is the difference between "be grouped under" and "be associated with"?

"Be grouped under" implies a clear categorization, whereas "be associated with" suggests a relationship or connection without necessarily belonging to the same category. Use "be associated with" when indicating a correlation rather than a strict classification.