Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be grouped into a
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be grouped into a" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the categorization or classification of items, concepts, or data into specific groups. Example: "The various species of birds can be grouped into a few main categories based on their habitats."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Instead, studies of size in human evolution indicate that representatives of Homo can be grouped into a reasonable ancestor-to-descendant sequence showing increases in body size.
Encyclopedias
The second group included wealthy Mets fans who might be willing to invest $5 million to $10 million and who could conceivably be grouped into a conglomerate.
News & Media
Asked what form the next wave of strike action could take, the Unison head said the walkouts could be grouped into a programme of protests split into regions or employment groups.
News & Media
Gasoline engines can be grouped into a number of types depending on several criteria, including their application, method of fuel management, ignition, piston-and-cylinder or rotor arrangement, strokes per cycle, cooling system, and valve type and location.
Encyclopedias
But he said plans to outsource some work from the Meault and Saint-Nazaire Airbus factories in France to Tunisia, and a similar plan for three sites to be grouped into a subsidiary in Germany, was one way to lower expenses.
News & Media
Each model can also be grouped into a list of its own type.
Note: two single U.S. locations were unable to be grouped into a region based on geolocation.
Science
Multiple chunks can be grouped into a segment in each vehicle.
Palaeolithic stone tools can be grouped into a number of different styles.
News & Media
Unlike Hunston's system, the overlapping resources encountered by Thetela's system and Hood's system can be grouped into a new context.
Science
MLC classification methods can be grouped into: (a) problem transformation methods, and (b) algorithm adaptation methods [25].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "be grouped into a", ensure that the criteria for grouping are clear and well-defined to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid grouping items into overly broad categories that lack specific distinctions. Ensure each group has unique and identifiable characteristics.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The primary grammatical function of "be grouped into a" is to act as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject is being categorized or classified. It's commonly used to describe how items or concepts are organized into distinct groups. This is supported by Ludwig's examples, which showcase its versatility across different contexts.
Frequent in
Science
65%
News & Media
15%
Encyclopedias
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
2%
Wiki
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "be grouped into a" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate categorization or classification. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, particularly in scientific and academic writing, but also appears in news and general reference materials. When using this phrase, clarity in grouping criteria is key. While "be classified into a", "be categorized into a", and "be organized into a" serve as effective alternatives, "be grouped into a" maintains its relevance across diverse communication scenarios.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be classified into a
This alternative emphasizes a formal or systematic categorization process.
be categorized into a
Similar to 'classified', this suggests a structured and organized grouping.
be clustered into a
This suggests grouping items based on similarities or proximity.
be divided into a
This implies a separation into distinct parts or sections.
be organized into a
This emphasizes the structured arrangement of items into a system.
be sorted into a
This suggests arranging items into a specific order or category.
be arranged into a
Focuses on the placement or organization of items into a specific configuration.
be assembled into a
Suggests that items are put together to form a larger grouping.
be consolidated into a
This implies combining several items into a single, unified group.
be integrated into a
Focuses on incorporating items into a unified whole.
FAQs
What does "be grouped into a" mean?
The phrase "be grouped into a" signifies that items, concepts, or data are classified or categorized into a specific group based on shared characteristics or criteria.
How can I use "be grouped into a" in a sentence?
You can use "be grouped into a" to describe the process of categorization, for example: "The students can "be grouped into a" team based on their skills".
What are some alternatives to "be grouped into a"?
You can use alternatives like "be classified into a", "be categorized into a", or "be divided into a" depending on the context.
Is it better to use "be grouped into a" or "be organized into a"?
Both phrases are correct, but "be organized into a" implies a more structured and systematic arrangement, while "be grouped into a" is a general term for categorization.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested