be feature of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be feature of" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an attempt to describe something that is characteristic or typical of something else, but it is not a standard expression. Example: "This design will be a feature of our new product line."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Inaugural Running of Excelsior Handicap Will Be Feature of the Racing at Jamaica.

The New York Times

Together these data suggest that HSF1-mediated augmentation of CSC phenotype involves mechanisms in addition to HSPs and EMT, including HSF1-mediated protein translation that may be feature of CSC survival.

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Such broad dips can be features of Mie resonance [3,4].

Nanoscale Research Letters

These will all be features of the operating system.

TechCrunch

Uncertainty and insecurity used to just be features of retail or manufacturing work.

Vice

These are features of many video games today.

The New Yorker

So are features of Google's search engine.

The New York Times - Tech

Chaos and uncertainty are features of every day for negotiators.

Harvard University

Vineyards and tea plantations are features of the regional economy.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Dry humor and tolerance of human foibles were features of Kenner's approach.

The New York Times - Books

That these are features of life in today's Venezuela is incontrovertible.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "be feature of" in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "be characteristic of" or "be a hallmark of" to ensure clarity and credibility.

Common error

A common mistake is assuming that "be feature of" is a standard English phrase. Instead, use established constructions such as "be a feature of", or better yet, "be characteristic of" or "be typical of".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be feature of" functions as an attempt to describe a characteristic or attribute. However, according to Ludwig AI, it's grammatically incorrect and not a standard English expression. Proper alternatives should be used instead.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be feature of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is not a standard English expression. While the intent might be to describe a characteristic or attribute, it's best to use established and grammatically sound alternatives such as "be a feature of" or "be characteristic of" to ensure clear and effective communication. The few examples found predominantly come from news and scientific sources, but their presence does not validate the phrase's correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be characteristic of

Changes the structure to a more grammatically sound and commonly used expression conveying a typical attribute.

be a hallmark of

Emphasizes that something is a distinguishing trait or signature element.

be typical of

Indicates that something is representative or commonly found in a particular context.

be part of

Highlights that something is a component or element within a larger whole.

be an attribute of

Focuses on a quality or characteristic that belongs to something.

be a property of

Similar to "be an attribute of", but often used in more formal or scientific contexts.

be indicative of

Suggests that something serves as a sign or indication of something else.

be a component of

Highlights the role of something as a constituent part of a larger system or structure.

be inherent in

Implies that something is naturally or essentially part of something else.

be intrinsic to

Similar to "be inherent in", emphasizing that something is an essential or natural part.

FAQs

What does "be feature of" mean?

The phrase "be feature of" is grammatically incorrect. It seems to be intended to mean "be a feature of" or "be characteristic of", but it's not a standard or accepted expression in English.

How can I correct the phrase "be feature of" in my writing?

Replace "be feature of" with phrases like "be a feature of", "be characteristic of", or "be typical of" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "be feature of" ever correct in English?

No, "be feature of" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Always use a more established phrase such as "be a feature of" instead.

What's the difference between "be feature of" and "be a feature of"?

"Be feature of" is grammatically incorrect, while "be a feature of" is a correct and commonly used phrase meaning that something is a notable aspect or part of something else.