be a feature of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be a feature of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is characteristic or typical of a particular subject or context. Example: "The ability to adapt to new environments can be a feature of successful species."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There will be a feature of that in Ed's speech".

The Guardian

Recycling would be a feature of both strategies.

The New York Times

Remixing continues to be a feature of the Scratch website.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Crises will always be a feature of life.

The New York Times

In fairness, this seems to be a feature of the Corvid family.

The Guardian

Horta-Osório will not want that to be a feature of his tenure at Lloyds.

The Guardian - Business

Attacks on buried targets are likely to be a feature of the next Gulf War.

The Guardian

It should be a feature of internet radios, which generally support DAB, FM and internet streaming.

The Guardian

This must not be a feature of the debate this time.

The Guardian

War lords, especially in the South, will still be a feature of Afghan governance and government.

The Guardian

"I think it will be a feature of the market for some time to come.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be a feature of", ensure the context clearly establishes what the subject is and what characteristic it possesses. For example, "User-friendly interface is a feature of the software".

Common error

Avoid using "be a feature of" when describing a temporary or non-essential aspect. The phrase implies a consistent or integral part of the subject.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be a feature of" functions as a predicative expression, indicating that something is a notable characteristic, element, or attribute of a particular subject. Ludwig shows its widespread use in describing inherent qualities across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

30%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "be a feature of" is a versatile phrase used to describe inherent qualities or characteristics of a subject. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across diverse contexts, including news, science, and academia. Related phrases such as "be characteristic of" and "be typical of" can provide nuanced alternatives. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects a consistent and integral aspect of the subject, and remember that neutral tone makes it suitable for various formality levels. Ludwig examples show its widespread applicability in clear and informative writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be characteristic of

Replaces "feature" with "characteristic", focusing on typical qualities.

be typical of

Emphasizes the commonness or usual nature of something.

be an attribute of

Highlights a quality or property inherent to something.

be an element of

Focuses on something being a component or part of a larger whole.

be a hallmark of

Suggests a distinctive or defining characteristic.

be indicative of

Implies that something serves as a sign or signal.

be representative of

Highlights the quality of being a typical example.

be associated with

Focuses on a connection or relationship.

be part and parcel of

Emphasizes that something is an essential or integral component.

be intrinsic to

Highlights that something is an essential element, natural to the thing.

FAQs

How can I use "be a feature of" in a sentence?

Use "be a feature of" to describe a characteristic or element that is typical or integral to something. For example, "Durability is a feature of this product".

What are some alternatives to "be a feature of"?

You can use alternatives such as "be characteristic of", "be typical of", or "be an attribute of" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "is a feature in" or "is a feature of"?

"Is a feature of" is generally the correct and more idiomatic choice when describing something that is part of or characteristic of something else. "Is a feature in" might be appropriate in specific contexts, such as describing something included in a list or within a specific environment.

What's the difference between "be a feature of" and "include"?

"Be a feature of" implies something is characteristic or integral. "Include" simply means something is part of a list or collection, without necessarily being a defining aspect. For instance, "Versatility is a feature of this tool" vs. "This tool includes a screwdriver and a wrench".