be explained by two limitations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be explained by two limitations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing factors or reasons that clarify or account for a particular situation or outcome. Example: "The unexpected results of the experiment can be explained by two limitations in the methodology used."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

This contradictory set of results could be explained by two limitations associated with this technique.

Annals of Intensive Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

This can easily be explained by two facts: first, by TRUS physical limitations (distance from the probe, calcifications, operator dependence), making this examination perform best in the posterior part of the peripheral zone (PZ) and poor elsewhere; despite significant technical advances [ 4, 5]; second, to the limitation of SB sampling to the posterior part of the PZ.

BioMed Research International

This can be explained by two reasons.

Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation

It can be explained by two reasons.

Nanoscale Research Letters

It can be explained by two factors.

BBC

This difference may be explained by two main reasons.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

In Theseimulatiobservations in Tables 4, 5, and 6, we canpare the performance for Stream 1, 2, and 3 for different beffexplained d = 15 m and QR-RLS algorithm mentioned in [12] is adopted as channel prediction algorithm.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The profiles may be explained by two factors.

Nanoscale Research Letters

This can be explained by two factors.

BMC Family Practice

This may be explained by two reasons.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

This may be explained by two factors.

BMC Family Practice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be explained by two limitations", ensure that the limitations are clearly defined and relevant to the context. Providing specific details about each limitation will strengthen your explanation.

Common error

Avoid using "be explained by two limitations" without specifying what those limitations are. A vague statement weakens your argument. Always provide concrete examples or descriptions of the limitations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be explained by two limitations" functions as a causal connector, indicating that a specific outcome or situation can be attributed to or understood through the presence of two limiting factors. It introduces an explanation based on constraints, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Unknown

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be explained by two limitations" functions as a causal connector, typically used in formal and scientific contexts to provide a reasoned explanation for an outcome. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While examples are rare, the phrase serves to clarify why something is not performing as expected, attributing it to two specific limiting factors. When employing this phrase, ensure that the limitations are clearly defined and relevant to enhance the explanation's effectiveness. Alternatives include "be attributed to two constraints" or "stem from two limiting factors", offering similar nuances. The main goal is to give a very clear and compelling argument to explain the results, using the more authoritative sources available.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be attributed to two constraints

Replaces "explained" with "attributed" and "limitations" with "constraints", emphasizing the causal relationship.

be due to two restrictions

Uses "due to" instead of "explained by", and "restrictions" instead of "limitations", highlighting causality.

stem from two limiting factors

Emphasizes the origin of the situation with "stem from", using "limiting factors" for limitations.

result from two boundary conditions

Focuses on the consequence using "result from" and replaces "limitations" with the more technical term "boundary conditions".

arise from two shortcomings

Highlights the emergence of the situation with "arise from", using "shortcomings" to suggest deficiencies.

be a consequence of two weaknesses

Uses "be a consequence of" to emphasize the outcome, and "weaknesses" instead of limitations.

be understood through two confines

Shifts focus to understanding, replacing limitations with "confines".

hinge on two delimiting factors

Uses "hinge on" to suggest dependence, and "delimiting factors" as a more formal substitute.

rest on two qualifying conditions

Emphasizes the foundational aspect with "rest on", and uses "qualifying conditions" for limitations.

be clarified by two caveats

Replaces "explained" with "clarified" and uses "caveats" to indicate conditions or warnings.

FAQs

How can I use "be explained by two limitations" in a sentence?

You can use "be explained by two limitations" to introduce the reasons why something is restricted or not fully achieved. For example, "The limited performance can "be explained by two limitations": the sample size and the data collection method."

What are some alternatives to "be explained by two limitations"?

Alternatives include "be attributed to two constraints", "be due to two restrictions", or "stem from two limiting factors", each offering a slightly different nuance in meaning.

Is it grammatically correct to say "be explained by two limitations"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The structure follows a passive voice construction where an outcome is attributed to specific limitations.

What's the difference between "be explained by limitations" and "be explained by factors"?

"Be explained by limitations" specifically refers to restrictions or constraints causing an outcome. "Be explained by factors" is more general and can include any contributing elements, not just limitations.