be equated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be equated with" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you are trying to express that something is considered to be the same as something else. For example: "The amazing success of the business has been equated with the hard work and dedication of its employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It should not be equated with democracy.

The New York Times

But imperfect knowledge cannot be equated with absolute ignorance.

The New York Times - Books

Union membership is not to be equated with ignorance.

The New York Times - Science

His stay at the embassy was his choice and cannot be equated with detention.

The Guardian

The great religions cannot be equated with the diminished and frozen fundamentalisms that they periodically spawn.

The New York Times

But can so much promising activity be equated with unstoppable progress?

The New York Times

Not voting is not to be equated with not having the right to vote.

The Guardian - Opinion

Like Mr. Morris, Mr. Gilbert emphasized that adventurous programming should not be equated with contemporary music.

The New York Times - Arts

"Abnormal bitterness tends to be equated with dietary danger, and rightly so," the authors wrote.

The New York Times - Health

The report noted that public statements on anti-corruption programmes cannot be equated with actual performance.

The Guardian

But it turns out that modern architecture cannot be equated with a particular style.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "be equated with" when you want to express that two concepts or entities are considered to be essentially the same in a specific context. This can help clarify complex relationships and avoid misunderstandings.

Common error

Avoid using "be equated with" when there are only superficial similarities between the things being compared. Overstating equivalence can lead to inaccurate generalizations and weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be equated with" functions as a linking verb phrase, indicating that one thing is considered equivalent or virtually identical to another. It's often used to define terms, clarify concepts, or draw parallels between different subjects as Ludwig showcases.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Huffington Post

8%

Los Angeles Times

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be equated with" is a versatile expression used to denote equivalence between two concepts or entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical status is correct, and its frequency of use is very common, appearing across a wide range of sources from News & Media to Science and Encyclopedias. When using "be equated with", ensure that the comparison is valid and avoid overstating similarities. Consider alternative phrases like "be considered the same as" or "be synonymous with" for nuanced expression. By understanding the context and purpose, you can effectively use "be equated with" to clarify relationships and enhance your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be considered the same as

Replaces "equated" with a more explicit phrasing of sameness or equivalence.

be regarded as identical to

Emphasizes that the things are seen as exactly the same, not just similar.

be synonymous with

Highlights that the things have the same or very similar meaning.

be analogous to

Suggests a comparison based on a similarity of function or relation.

be comparable to

Indicates that the things can be compared because they share common attributes.

be tantamount to

Implies that the things are virtually the same in effect or value.

be identified with

Focuses on the association of one thing with another, often in terms of characteristics or qualities.

correspond to

Highlights that the things are in agreement or conformity with each other.

be seen as linked to

Emphasizes the connection or association between the things.

be associated with

Indicates a general connection or relationship, without necessarily implying equivalence.

FAQs

How can I use "be equated with" in a sentence?

The phrase "be equated with" is used to show that two things are considered to be the same or have a very similar effect. For example, "In this context, success can "be equated with" financial stability".

What are some alternatives to "be equated with"?

Alternatives include "be considered the same as", "be regarded as identical to", or "be synonymous with". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to use "be equated with"?

While generally correct, "be equated with" should be used judiciously. Ensure that the comparison is valid and not an oversimplification. In cases where there are only partial similarities, consider using phrases like "be associated with" or "be linked to".

What's the difference between "be equated with" and "be associated with"?

"Be equated with" implies a strong equivalence, suggesting the things are essentially the same. "Be associated with", on the other hand, indicates a connection or relationship, but does not necessarily imply equivalence. Therefore, be associated with is a broader and less definitive statement.