Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be categorized on a

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be categorized on a" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "be categorized as" or "be categorized into" depending on the context. Example: "Items can be categorized on a scale of importance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Ole Miss only contested one of the 28 allegations while stating that five more should be categorized on a different level.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

It was designed as a retrospective multicenter study, and clinical manifestations could only be categorized on an all-or-none basis, instead of more a sophisticated standardized scoring system.

The responses were categorized on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 1, representing "strongly disagree," to 5, representing "strongly agree".

Radio blackouts are categorized on a scale from R1 (minor) to R5 (extreme).

News & Media

Huffington Post

In addition to fine-grained coding, each transcript was categorized on a whole-discussion level for several different features.

All the data were categorized on a monthly basis to assess any possible seasonality in Giardia prevalence.

All the data presented here were categorized on a growth stage basis as estimated by number of leaves.

Regimens were categorized on a cycle-specific basis according to the number of agents administered that are considered to be myelotoxic (list available from authors upon request).

One example was the work that has been undertaken in the Netherlands where articles are categorized on a scale that allows scoring the evidence using explicit criteria.

The RV function was categorized on a visual scale 1 6 (1 = normal, 2 = mild, 3 = mild moderate, 4 = moderate, 5 = moderate severe, 6 = severe dysfunction).

The levels of comprehensibility for each item were categorized on a 4-point scale (0, not comprehensible; 1, slightly comprehensible; 2, moderately comprehensible; and 3, highly comprehensible).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct preposition after "categorized". The standard form is "be categorized as" or "be categorized by" depending on the context. "Be categorized on a" is generally considered ungrammatical.

Common error

Avoid using "on a" after "categorized". The correct phrasing is typically "categorized as" or "categorized by". For instance, say "the data was categorized as high, medium, or low risk", not "the data was categorized on a high, medium, or low risk".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be categorized on a" functions as part of a passive construction, attempting to describe the act of classifying something based on certain criteria. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically incorrect in standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "be categorized on a" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct alternatives include "be categorized as" or "be categorized by", depending on the intended meaning. While it appears in some contexts such as Science and News & Media, its incorrect usage undermines its effectiveness in formal communication. It's crucial to use the correct preposition to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.

FAQs

What are the correct alternatives to "be categorized on a"?

The grammatically correct alternatives include "be categorized as", "be classified as", or "be grouped into".

How can I use "be categorized as" in a sentence?

For example, you could say: "The responses "were categorized as" strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree."

What's the difference between "be categorized as" and "be categorized by"?

"Be categorized as" describes what category something belongs to (e.g., "The book "is categorized as" fiction"), whereas "be categorized by" describes the criteria used for categorization (e.g., "The students "were categorized by" age").

Is "be categorized on a" ever correct?

While rarely used and generally considered incorrect, it might appear in specific, non-standard contexts. However, it's best to use "be categorized as" or a similar, grammatically sound alternative.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: