Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
be categorized on a
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "be categorized on a" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "be categorized as" or "be categorized into" depending on the context. Example: "Items can be categorized on a scale of importance."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Ole Miss only contested one of the 28 allegations while stating that five more should be categorized on a different level.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
It was designed as a retrospective multicenter study, and clinical manifestations could only be categorized on an all-or-none basis, instead of more a sophisticated standardized scoring system.
The responses were categorized on a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from 1, representing "strongly disagree," to 5, representing "strongly agree".
Science
Radio blackouts are categorized on a scale from R1 (minor) to R5 (extreme).
News & Media
In addition to fine-grained coding, each transcript was categorized on a whole-discussion level for several different features.
Science
All the data were categorized on a monthly basis to assess any possible seasonality in Giardia prevalence.
All the data presented here were categorized on a growth stage basis as estimated by number of leaves.
Science
Regimens were categorized on a cycle-specific basis according to the number of agents administered that are considered to be myelotoxic (list available from authors upon request).
Science
One example was the work that has been undertaken in the Netherlands where articles are categorized on a scale that allows scoring the evidence using explicit criteria.
The RV function was categorized on a visual scale 1 6 (1 = normal, 2 = mild, 3 = mild moderate, 4 = moderate, 5 = moderate severe, 6 = severe dysfunction).
The levels of comprehensibility for each item were categorized on a 4-point scale (0, not comprehensible; 1, slightly comprehensible; 2, moderately comprehensible; and 3, highly comprehensible).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct preposition after "categorized". The standard form is "be categorized as" or "be categorized by" depending on the context. "Be categorized on a" is generally considered ungrammatical.
Common error
Avoid using "on a" after "categorized". The correct phrasing is typically "categorized as" or "categorized by". For instance, say "the data was categorized as high, medium, or low risk", not "the data was categorized on a high, medium, or low risk".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "be categorized on a" functions as part of a passive construction, attempting to describe the act of classifying something based on certain criteria. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically incorrect in standard English.
Frequent in
Science
66%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "be categorized on a" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct alternatives include "be categorized as" or "be categorized by", depending on the intended meaning. While it appears in some contexts such as Science and News & Media, its incorrect usage undermines its effectiveness in formal communication. It's crucial to use the correct preposition to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
be categorized as
This corrects the grammatical error by using the standard preposition "as" for categorization.
be classified as
Replaces "categorized" with "classified", providing a synonym with similar meaning and correct grammar.
be grouped into
Uses "grouped into" to indicate placement within a specific group, ensuring grammatical correctness.
be sorted by
Indicates arrangement based on a particular criterion, offering a slightly different but related meaning.
be divided into
Suggests separation into distinct groups, maintaining the core concept of classification.
be arranged by
Implies organization according to a set of rules or criteria.
be organized by
Indicates a structured arrangement based on specific characteristics.
be labeled as
Focuses on assigning labels or designations to items within a category.
be indexed by
Suggests systematic listing and classification, often in a database or reference work.
be filed under
Implies categorization within a filing system or similar organizational structure.
FAQs
What are the correct alternatives to "be categorized on a"?
The grammatically correct alternatives include "be categorized as", "be classified as", or "be grouped into".
How can I use "be categorized as" in a sentence?
For example, you could say: "The responses "were categorized as" strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree."
What's the difference between "be categorized as" and "be categorized by"?
"Be categorized as" describes what category something belongs to (e.g., "The book "is categorized as" fiction"), whereas "be categorized by" describes the criteria used for categorization (e.g., "The students "were categorized by" age").
Is "be categorized on a" ever correct?
While rarely used and generally considered incorrect, it might appear in specific, non-standard contexts. However, it's best to use "be categorized as" or a similar, grammatically sound alternative.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested