Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

be a danger to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be a danger to" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing potential threats or risks posed by someone or something to a person, group, or situation. Example: "The chemicals in the factory can be a danger to the local wildlife." Alternative expressions include "pose a threat to" and "represent a risk to."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He'll be a danger to witnesses.

News & Media

Independent

Baseball always seems to be a danger to itself.

Dogs Animals can be a danger to themselves and others.

Esophageal foreign bodies can be a danger to a patient's life.

If that happens, the scientist said, there could be a danger to ships.

News & Media

Independent

My fear is that I've raised a monster who will be a danger to women.

It would be a danger to try to go out to keep a clean sheet.

But it's an issue he understands could be a danger to his administration".

News & Media

The New York Times

However, rapid evolution can also be a danger to our health and a stumbling block for biotechnology.

Free to mount his nuclear bombs on his ever-farther-flying missiles, Mr Kim would be a danger to all.

News & Media

The Economist

It was only then the woman realized that this could be a danger to her child, Dr. Judith Palfrey said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Pair this phrase with auxiliary verbs like "could", "may" or "might" to express uncertainty or potentiality in scientific and legal reporting.

Common error

Avoid using "be a danger to" when you mean the subject is the one facing the threat. Use "be in danger of" instead. For example, say "The species is in danger of extinction", not "The species is a danger to extinction", unless the species is the cause of the hazard.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be a danger to" functions as a copular construction where the subject is linked to a noun phrase acting as a subject complement. This structure is used to attribute the specific quality of being a hazard to a person, object or situation. According to Ludwig AI, this is a standard and grammatically correct way to describe risk factors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The expression "be a danger to" is a fundamental and highly frequent phrase in English, particularly within high-stakes contexts such as news reporting, legal assessments and scientific warnings. Verified as correct by Ludwig AI, it provides a precise way to link a subject to a potential hazard. Its prevalence in top-tier sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscores its reliability and formal acceptance. Whether used to describe environmental threats or individual safety risks, the phrase remains a clear and authoritative choice. Writers should distinguish it from passive vulnerability phrases like "be in danger of" to maintain semantic precision. Overall, it is an essential construction for anyone needing to articulate risk or hazard with clarity.

FAQs

How to use "be a danger to" in a sentence?

You can use "be a danger to" to identify a threat, such as in the sentence "Unvaccinated people could "be a danger to" the general population."

What can I say instead of "be a danger to"?

Depending on the tone, you can use alternatives like "pose a threat to", "endanger" or "be a hazard to".

Which is correct, "be a danger to" or "be a danger for"?

"be a danger to" is the standard idiomatic expression in English. While "be a danger for" is occasionally seen, it is far less common and usually sounds less natural to native speakers.

What is the difference between "be a danger to" and "be harmful to"?

While "be harmful to" suggests causing general damage, "be a danger to" typically implies a more severe, immediate or existential threat to safety.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: