basis for talk of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "basis for talk of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the foundation or reasoning behind a particular topic or conversation. Example: "The recent findings provide a strong basis for talk of climate change policies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

We have here the basis for talk of immateriality in perception.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But Mr. Netanyahu has not endorsed the idea of land exchanges, and rejects any mention of the 1967 lines as the basis for talks.

The New York Times

To abandon Oslo, its leaders say, is to destroy any hope of negotiations, because that will rip up the legal basis for talks.

The New York Times

Otherwise there is no basis for talks.

The Guardian - Opinion

Tougher U.S. Business Reform Bill Is Basis For Talks.

Forbes

But a clearer policy would help the companies draw up new business plans, which they could then present to creditor banks as a basis for restructuring talks.Eduardo Cepeda, president of J.P. Morgan in Mexico, said private-debt workouts would be a sign of maturity in Mexico's financial system, noting that Mexican banks fortunately have the capital to withstand a hit to their balance-sheets.

The Economist

Negotiators for General Motors and Daewoo Motor's creditors are working on a memorandum of understanding that will form the basis for final talks that would give G.M. control of the company.

The New York Times

Sitting near a tan oil painting of Koranic calligraphy, Mr. Mottaki said the basis for the talks had to be a variety of issues, including the recession, trade, regional conflicts and international disarmament, as well as differences over nuclear matters like the oversight function of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The New York Times

De Mistura hopes the modest document will form the basis for reconvened talks starting in the second week of April, and will argue that the fact neither the talks nor the cessation of hostilities have collapsed in the past fortnight represents a platform on which to build.

The Guardian

He apparently won concessions on the new framework, which American, Israeli and Palestinian officials said would allow Washington to declare the 1967 prewar borders as the basis for the talks — along with the recognition of Israel as a Jewish state — but allow Mr. Netanyahu and Mr. Abbas to distance themselves from those terms.

The New York Times

The basis for direct talks is likely to be Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's carefully shaped formula of last November.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "basis for talk of", ensure that the context clearly establishes what the foundation or reason for the discussion is. This provides clarity and strengthens the argument or point being made.

Common error

Avoid using "basis for talk of" without clearly specifying what the basis is. A lack of context can lead to confusion and weaken the statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "basis for talk of" functions as a noun phrase that introduces the reasoning or foundation behind a discussion. It highlights the underlying cause or justification for a conversation, as exemplified by the Ludwig example.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "basis for talk of" is a phrase used to denote the underlying reason or foundation for a discussion. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, although its usage is relatively rare. It appears in various contexts, including News & Media and Science, but writers should ensure clarity and context when using it. Consider alternatives like "reason for discussing" for potentially more formal tones. While grammatically sound, ensure the basis is clearly defined to avoid vague or confusing statements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reason for discussing

Emphasizes the justification behind a conversation.

grounds for discussing

Highlights the justification upon which a conversation is initiated.

justification for discussing

Focuses on providing a rationale for a conversation.

rationale for discussing

Underscores the logical reasons behind a conversation.

foundation for discussing

Stresses the underpinning upon which a conversation is built.

pretext for discussing

Suggests an excuse or ostensible reason for a conversation.

excuse for discussing

Implies a justification, potentially weak, for a conversation.

impetus for discussion

Highlights the driving force or motivation behind the conversation.

springboard for discussion

Indicates something that initiates a discussion.

catalyst for discussion

Emphasizes the element that sparks or accelerates a discussion.

FAQs

How can I use "basis for talk of" in a sentence?

You can use "basis for talk of" to indicate the foundation or reason for a discussion. For instance, "The new research provides a "basis for talk of" new treatments" shows that research is the reason for the treatment discussion.

What are some alternatives to "basis for talk of"?

Alternatives include "reason for discussing", "grounds for discussing", or "justification for discussing", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "basis for talk of" in formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "basis for talk of" may sound slightly informal for some formal contexts. Consider using alternatives like "foundation for discussion" or "rationale for conversation" in highly formal settings.

What's the difference between "basis for talk of" and "topic of discussion"?

"Basis for talk of" indicates the underlying reason or foundation for a conversation, whereas "topic of discussion" simply refers to the subject being discussed. The former explains why the conversation is happening, while the latter identifies what the conversation is about.