Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
bad items
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "bad items" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to products, objects, or elements that are of poor quality or undesirable in some way. Example: "The store had to recall the bad items due to safety concerns."
✓ Grammatically correct
Academia
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
14 human-written examples
No matter how carefully it's constructed, an exam can have bad items -- they may be just too difficult, or they may not tap the kinds of basic concepts and principles that should be the subject of examination.
I try not to write bad items at the outset, but after the exam is over there are ways to identify and correct items that, despite our efforts, just aren't right.
We assigned 16 items to be bad items, with each type associated with four items.
The simulations are set up in the same way as before, but with the item probabilities for the bad items determined by the equations above.
For bad items of type 4, the values of power are smaller compared to other bad item types, but this is due to the fact that the IRT model can approximate the wiggly curve reasonably well.
They have worked through most of the bad items," says Brett Miller of AG Edwards, who says the company has also streamlined its supply chain to better take advantage of drops in component costs.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
46 human-written examples
Table 2 Power of the item-fit residuals for LTT math age 9 simulations Item type Mean (−3 to 3) Mean (−2 to 2) Bad item 1 74 84 Bad item 2 96 94 Bad item 3 86 90 Bad item 4 52 68.
The power for the four bad item types are shown in Table 2.
As expected, both values of power are satisfactory for each bad item type.
The item response functions are again evaluated at 31 points between −3 and 3. Fig. 3 Item response functions for each of the four bad item types.
Then you can reload if you die, get a bad item, or just want to play through a part again.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing products, be specific about what makes the "bad items" undesirable. Use descriptive adjectives to clarify the nature of the defects or shortcomings. For instance, instead of simply stating "bad items", try "defective electronic components" or "spoiled perishable goods."
Common error
Avoid using "bad items" without providing context or specifics. This vague term can be confusing. Always specify the type of items and the nature of their deficiencies to ensure clarity and prevent misunderstandings.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "bad items" primarily functions as a noun phrase, where "bad" acts as a descriptive adjective modifying the noun "items". It's used to identify and categorize things based on their undesirable qualities. As Ludwig AI suggests, the phrase is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
News & Media
24%
Wiki
24%
Science
21%
Less common in
Academia
18%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "bad items" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase that functions as a noun phrase with an adjective modifier. As Ludwig AI verifies, it's suitable for categorizing and discussing things based on their undesirable qualities across various contexts, primarily in news, wikis and science. To enhance clarity, specify the type of items and their specific flaws. In formal settings, consider using terms like "defective products" or "substandard merchandise". Remember, providing specific details is always better than using vague generalizations.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
defective products
Focuses specifically on products that have manufacturing flaws.
poor quality goods
Highlights the low quality of the items in question.
substandard merchandise
Emphasizes that the items do not meet the required standards.
faulty articles
Indicates that the items have defects or are not working properly.
inferior products
Highlights that the items are of lower quality compared to others.
undesirable goods
Focuses on the items being unwanted or not meeting expectations.
unacceptable articles
Emphasizes that the items are not suitable or satisfactory.
worthless items
Indicates that the items have little to no value.
junk products
Suggests that the items are of very low quality and disposable.
damaged goods
Specifies that the items have physical harm or impairment.
FAQs
How can I use the phrase "bad items" in a sentence?
You can use "bad items" to refer to products or elements that are of poor quality or undesirable. For example, "The store had to recall the "bad items" due to safety concerns."
What are some alternatives to "bad items"?
Some alternatives include "defective products", "poor quality goods", or "substandard merchandise", depending on the specific context.
Is it appropriate to use "bad items" in formal writing?
While grammatically correct, "bad items" may sound too informal for certain formal contexts. Consider using more precise and professional terms like "non-conforming products" or "defective goods".
How can I be more specific than just saying "bad items"?
To be more specific, identify the type of items (e.g., "bad electronic components") and the nature of their problem (e.g., "spoiled perishable goods"). Providing details helps avoid vagueness and ensures clear communication.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested