bad information

USAGE SUMMARY

"bad information" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, you could write: The newspaper reported bad information about the upcoming election.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Bad information?

The New York Times

Had he been given bad information?

The New Yorker

It's possible to get bad information anywhere".

The New Yorker

But he is getting bad information".

The New York Times

Such bad information is worse than none, reckons Ms Hackett.

The Economist

I am afraid your PCP has some bad information.

The New Yorker

The Internet, after all, is thick with bad information.

The New York Times

The bullwhip effect is a result of bad information.

The New Yorker

Is Brennan angry about getting bad information about torture?

The New Yorker

People now accept that bad information can be damaging".

The Guardian

Knowing how to distinguish good information from bad information".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "bad information", ensure you clarify the source and potential consequences of relying on it. Context is crucial to convey the gravity of misinformation.

Common error

Avoid stating that "bad information" always leads to severe outcomes without providing specific evidence or context. Quantify the potential harm or provide examples to strengthen your claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bad information" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "bad" is an adjective modifying the noun "information". Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and suitable for use in writing. Examples show it describing data that is flawed, inaccurate, or misleading.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "bad information" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe data that is flawed, inaccurate, or misleading. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and appropriate for use in written English. As demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, it is prevalent in contexts such as News & Media. When using "bad information", clarify the source, potential consequences, and avoid overgeneralizing its impact. Alternatives include "incorrect data", "false intelligence", and "misleading details", depending on context. The best approach is to provide details to show why and how the "bad information" is impacting the context of the sentence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

incorrect data

Emphasizes the factual inaccuracy of the information.

false intelligence

Specifically refers to misleading information gathered for strategic purposes.

misleading details

Focuses on the deceptive nature of the information.

erroneous facts

Highlights the factual errors present in the information.

inaccurate reporting

Specifically refers to incorrect information presented in reports or news.

unreliable sources

Shifts the focus from the information itself to the untrustworthy origin of the information.

faulty knowledge

Indicates a flawed understanding or comprehension.

deceptive propaganda

Emphasizes the manipulative intent behind the distribution of the information.

distorted accounts

Focuses on how the information has been altered or misrepresented.

fabricated evidence

Highlights that the information is not genuine and was created with malicious intent.

FAQs

How can I use "bad information" in a sentence?

You can use "bad information" to describe incorrect or misleading data. For example: "The decision was based on "bad information" and led to negative consequences."

What are some alternatives to saying "bad information"?

Alternatives to "bad information" include "incorrect data", "false intelligence", or "misleading details", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "bad information" or "poor information"?

Both "bad information" and "poor information" are grammatically correct. "Bad information" generally refers to inaccurate or false data, while "poor information" might suggest incomplete or insufficient data. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "bad information" and "misinformation"?

"Bad information" is a general term for inaccurate or incorrect data. "Misinformation", on the other hand, implies that the information is not only incorrect but also unintentionally misleading. Unlike "disinformation" which is intentionally misleading.