bad contents

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bad contents" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe materials or information that are of poor quality or inappropriate in some way. Example: "The report was filled with bad contents that misled the readers and caused confusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

We hereby inform you that we will deal with Resolution 1441, despite its bad contents.

The New York Times

The letter said, in an English translation provided by Iraq, "We hereby inform you that we will deal with Resolution 1441, despite its bad contents".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But Facebook product manager Sara Su said people alone are not able to catch all bad content.

The Washington Post

But labour isn't thousands of times cheaper, and good content has not gotten thousands of times easier to distinguish from bad content in the interim.

The Guardian - Tech

But bad memes are far from unique to any one party, as much as each likes to call attention to the other side's bad content.

The Guardian

On Facebook, "unfollowing" someone – the tab next to "friends" on their profile page – means you won't see their bad content.

The Guardian

But those small steps did not address the fundamental problem: The TED name had become associated with bad content, as the chortle-inducing lineup of TEDxValenciaWomen made clear.

Harvard Business Review

For Mr. Trump, "these are good optics but bad content," said Jeffrey Wilson, a research fellow at the Perth USAsia Center at the University of Western Australia.

The New York Times

A team of four researchers at Rappler was quickly set up to look for bad content and then send it on to reporters to discredit and notify Facebook.

The New York Times

Doesn't letting people ask questions and write answers lead to a lot of bad content, like what exists on Yahoo Answers?

MIT Technology Review

The account's creator, who asked to be identified only as Adrian of Canberra, told Guardian Australia that he set it up in January 2015, when he noticed sledging over bad content from both sides of the political spectrum.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "bad contents", ensure the context clearly defines what makes the contents "bad". Be specific about the nature of the problem, such as inaccuracy, offensiveness, or poor quality.

Common error

Avoid using "bad contents" without providing context. Instead of saying "the document contained bad contents", specify what made it bad, such as "the document contained inaccurate data" or "the document contained offensive language".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bad contents" functions as a noun phrase, where "bad" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "contents". Ludwig AI shows it being used to describe the negative attributes of certain materials or information.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "bad contents" is a grammatically correct phrase, though less commonly used than alternatives like "poor content" or "inappropriate content". Ludwig AI confirms its usage in reputable sources such as news outlets, where it serves to negatively characterize the quality or nature of information or materials. When using this phrase, ensure to provide specific context about what makes the contents "bad" to avoid ambiguity. Although the phrase is not incorrect, be aware that other phrases such as "bad content" are much more frequent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

poor contents

Emphasizes the low quality of the contents.

inferior contents

Highlights the substandard nature of the contents.

subpar contents

Indicates that the contents are below the expected standard.

defective contents

Focuses on flaws or imperfections in the contents.

unacceptable contents

Stresses that the contents do not meet the required criteria.

undesirable contents

Highlights the unwanted nature of the contents.

harmful contents

Points out the potentially damaging effects of the contents.

offensive contents

Emphasizes that the contents may cause offense.

inappropriate contents

Indicates that the contents are not suitable for a particular context.

unsuitable contents

Suggests that the contents are not appropriate for a specific purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "bad contents" in a sentence?

You can use "bad contents" to describe information or materials that are of poor quality or inappropriate. For example, "The website was flagged due to its "bad contents"".

What are some alternatives to "bad contents"?

Alternatives include "poor contents", "inappropriate content", or "low-quality material" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "bad content" or "bad contents"?

While "bad contents" is grammatically correct, "bad content" is more commonly used, especially in modern online discourse. "Contents" implies multiple items, so use it when referring to a collection of problematic items.

What makes content "bad"?

Content can be considered "bad" if it's inaccurate, misleading, offensive, harmful, low-quality, or irrelevant to the intended purpose. The specific definition depends on the context.