background of evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "background of evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the context or supporting information related to a particular claim or argument. Example: "In order to understand the implications of the study, it is essential to consider the background of evidence that supports the findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

A background of evidence of the importance and impact of damage healing in asphalt pavements from laboratory and field studies is presented.

Advances in Asphalt Materials Road and Pavement Construction

Against the background of evidence for a higher degree of education in enrolled patients [ 27] this bias might especially affect not enrolled patients.

BMC Health Services Research

In the early 1990s, against a background of evidence that birth outcomes can be improved if women seek antenatal care early in pregnancy, the World Health Organization (WHO) endorsed a package of Focused Antenatal Care (fANC) services [ 6].

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

As already suggested, scientific investigation or inquiry is always conducted against the background of an evidence base, a body of background knowledge or belief.

SEP

This is of particular importance also on the background of the evidence that, in diabetic patients, office BP frequently fails to identify their exposure to elevated BP in daily life conditions.

Diabetes Care

Results from IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial) [ 80] comparing statin-ezetimibe combination therapy versus statin alone against a background of best evidence-based treatment in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) setting are critical to resolve this issue.

Cardiovascular Diabetology

Background: Different lines of evidence suggest that low-level lead exposure could be a modifiable risk factor for adverse psychological symptoms, but little work has explored this relation.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Background: Epidemiological evidence of the effects of long-term exposure to air pollution on the chronic processes of atherogenesis is limited.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Background: Evidence of an association between fish and meat consumption and risk of dementia is inconsistent and nonexistent in populations in developing countries.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Background: There is lack of evidence on how to detoxify medication-overuse headache (MOH).

The Journal of Headache and Pain

We will first consider some background issues about types of evidence, populations, exposures, follow-up, and patterns of hazard ratios over exposure time.

American Journal of Epidemiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "background of evidence", ensure the evidence you refer to is clearly defined and relevant to the topic at hand. Providing specific examples or citations can strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "background of evidence" when the evidence itself is weak, poorly defined, or irrelevant. Always ensure the evidence is strong and directly supports your claims.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "background of evidence" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to introduce or frame a discussion by referring to the existing body of knowledge or supporting data relevant to a particular topic. Ludwig provides examples showing this usage in various academic and research contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

22%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "background of evidence" serves to contextualize information within an existing body of knowledge. It is most frequently used in scientific and formal contexts, as supported by Ludwig's analysis. While grammatically sound, its relatively low frequency suggests that alternative phrases like "contextual evidence" or "supporting evidence" may be more commonly encountered. However, Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English, particularly when emphasizing the foundational or supporting nature of the evidence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

contextual evidence

Focuses on the context in which the evidence is presented.

supporting evidence

Highlights the evidence that supports a particular claim.

foundational evidence

Emphasizes that the evidence is the foundation for something.

historical context of evidence

Specifies the historical aspects relating to the evidence.

evidentiary basis

Refers to the base or foundation established by the evidence.

substantiating information

Highlights that the information is meant to substantiate a claim.

underlying evidence

Focuses on evidence that is not immediately apparent but still important.

circumstantial evidence

Refers to evidence that relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion.

body of supporting data

Emphasizes that there is a large amount of data supporting a claim.

preexisting knowledge base

Highlights the prior knowledge available before considering new evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "background of evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "background of evidence" to introduce supporting information or context relevant to a particular argument or study. For example, "Against the "background of evidence" suggesting a link between diet and health, researchers conducted a new study."

What's a good alternative to "background of evidence"?

Alternatives include "contextual evidence", "supporting evidence", or "foundational evidence", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to say "context of evidence" or "background of evidence"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "background of evidence" is more specific in referring to the supporting information or prior knowledge that makes the evidence understandable. "Context of evidence" focuses more on the surrounding circumstances.

What does it mean to consider something against a "background of evidence"?

Considering something against a "background of evidence" means evaluating it in light of existing research, data, or information that provides context and support for understanding its significance and validity.