average extraction efficiency

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "average extraction efficiency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to scientific research, engineering, or any field where the effectiveness of a process is being measured. Example: "The average extraction efficiency of the solvent was determined to be 85%, indicating a successful separation of the desired compounds."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The spin-dSPE method yielded an average extraction efficiency of ∼45% from 0.6 μL of whole blood.

Analytica Chimica Acta

The average extraction efficiency from a matrix of tilapia fillets was approximately 73% and the day-to-day reproducibility for these extractions in the assay was between 5 and 10%.

Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The average extraction efficiencies of the five metabolites were, respectively, 45, 84, 97, 96, and 93%.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Mean extraction efficiency was 73%% and final concentrations were corrected for individual extraction efficiencies.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

The results obtained showed that very low pH in the range of 8.5 9 (average 8.7) and as well as in high pH in the range of 11 11.5 (average 11.3), extraction efficiency for all three compounds in the study, significantly decreased.

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Then, we took the average value on the extraction efficiency.

Nanoscale Research Letters

As the H value is an average, it represents the extraction efficiency for all the analyzed TCADs.

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

The extraction efficiency was found on the average peak area of each analyte for three replicate analyses.

International Journal of Industrial Chemistry

The exit concentrations in cyclic steady state are averaged over one time cycle to obtain the extraction efficiency.

Chemical Engineering Science

Also, in the pH 10 11 (average 10.5) is a very small reduction in the extraction efficiency.

Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Extraction efficiency of total soil P was on average only slightly lower for the 1 4 extracts (41%) than for the 1 10 extracts (47%).

Geoderma

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting "average extraction efficiency", always specify the matrix, method, and conditions under which it was determined to provide context.

Common error

Avoid stating the "average extraction efficiency" without mentioning the specific conditions or sample types, as it can lead to misinterpretations and inaccurate comparisons.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "average extraction efficiency" functions as a noun phrase that describes a performance metric. It quantifies the effectiveness of an extraction process by providing a typical or mean value. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is perfectly valid and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "average extraction efficiency" is a grammatically correct and scientifically relevant term used to quantify the effectiveness of an extraction process. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it is perfectly usable in English and primarily appears in scientific contexts. When using this phrase, it's crucial to specify the experimental conditions and matrix to avoid overgeneralization. Alternative phrases, such as "mean extraction efficiency" or "typical extraction efficiency", can be used to convey similar meanings. Always aim for clarity and context to ensure accurate communication of your results.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mean extraction efficiency

Replaces "average" with "mean", a synonym indicating a calculated central value.

typical extraction efficiency

Substitutes "average" with "typical", suggesting a commonly observed efficiency.

usual extraction efficiency

Uses "usual" instead of "average", indicating the efficiency that is most often encountered.

standard extraction efficiency

Replaces "average" with "standard", suggesting a benchmark or expected level of efficiency.

expected extraction efficiency

Emphasizes the anticipated level of efficiency rather than the measured average.

nominal extraction efficiency

Uses "nominal" to refer to the intended or designed efficiency, which might be different from the actual average.

general extraction efficiency

Replaces "average" with "general", implying a widespread or common level of efficiency.

routine extraction efficiency

Suggests that the efficiency is part of regular procedures.

approximate extraction efficiency

Replaces "average" with "approximate", indicating an estimated level of efficiency.

representative extraction efficiency

Emphasizes that the reported efficiency is a fair representation of the extraction process.

FAQs

How is "average extraction efficiency" calculated?

The "average extraction efficiency" is calculated by determining the amount of target analyte recovered from a sample after extraction, compared to the initial amount present, and then averaging these values across multiple replicates.

What factors can affect the "average extraction efficiency"?

Factors affecting the "average extraction efficiency" include the choice of solvent, extraction time, temperature, pH, and the matrix complexity of the sample.

What is a good "average extraction efficiency"?

A good "average extraction efficiency" depends on the application and the complexity of the matrix, but generally, values above 70% are considered acceptable. However, for some applications, even lower efficiencies may be sufficient if the method is reproducible and sensitive enough.

How can I improve the "average extraction efficiency" in my experiments?

To improve the "average extraction efficiency", you can optimize the extraction solvent, increase the extraction time, adjust the temperature or pH, or use techniques like sonication or microwave assistance to enhance analyte recovery.