audits of

USAGE SUMMARY

"audits of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when referring to the examination of something, usually financial records or procedures, to ensure accuracy or legislation is being followed. For example, "The company completed several audits of their finances to ensure they were in compliance with all tax regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Audits of corporations also fell again.

The New York Times

They're doing audits of every campaign.

The New York Times

Both companies also conduct audits of suppliers.

The Guardian

It also said it had commissioned independent audits of them.

The Guardian

The hard work is investigating, supervising, challenging players, doing random audits of players, random audits of referees.

The Guardian - Sport

That means better audits of all providers regularly.

The New York Times

How many conduct independent audits of their cybervulnerabilities?

The New York Times

Beginning March 1, the union will institute regular, random financial audits of agents' receipts and expenses.

The New York Times - Sports

The standards also call for third-party audits of impression reports from online publishers.

The New York Times

But last year it did sue Arthur Andersen for its audits of Waste Management.

The New York Times

"We need to have regular audits of these systems," he says.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "audits of", clearly specify what is being audited to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "audits of" in casual conversation or informal writing; opt for simpler terms like "checks on" or "reviews of" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "audits of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to specify the object or area being examined in a formal audit process. As Ludwig shows, it commonly precedes nouns referring to financial records, systems, or processes.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "audits of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase in formal English. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to indicate a formal examination or verification process. Predominantly found in News & Media and Formal & Business contexts, the phrase is best suited for professional settings where accuracy and compliance are paramount. When using "audits of", ensure you clearly specify the subject being audited to maintain clarity. Alternatives such as "reviews of" or "inspections of" can be used in more informal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reviews of

Replaces "audits" with a more general term for examination.

inspections of

Suggests a more detailed and physical examination.

examinations of

A formal and thorough investigation.

assessments of

Focuses on evaluating the quality or value of something.

evaluations of

Highlights the process of judging or determining the significance of something.

checks on

Implies a simpler, less formal review.

verifications of

Focuses on confirming the truth or accuracy of something.

investigations into

Suggests a deeper inquiry, often into potential wrongdoing.

scrutinies of

Implies a careful and critical examination.

monitoring of

Suggests ongoing observation and review.

FAQs

How can I use "audits of" in a sentence?

You can use "audits of" to describe a formal examination of records or accounts. For example, "The company conducts regular "audits of" its financial statements."

What are some alternatives to "audits of"?

Alternatives to "audits of" include "reviews of", "inspections of", or "examinations of", depending on the context and level of formality.

When is it appropriate to use "audits of"?

"Audits of" is appropriate in formal and professional contexts, such as business, finance, and legal settings, where a thorough examination is required.

What's the difference between "audits of" and "reviews of"?

"Audits of" typically refers to a more formal and structured examination, often conducted to verify accuracy and compliance. "Reviews of", on the other hand, can be less formal and may focus on providing an overview or assessment.